Facts
The claimant appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Palanpur’s judgment and award dated 23 September 2017 in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 47 of 2013.
Source reference: p. 1The vehicle-related facts and the liability of the owner and insurer were not disputed in the appeal.
Source reference: p. 1The claimant argued that the Tribunal had under-assessed compensation, including for pain and suffering, transportation, special diet and medical expenses; the insurer maintained that the award was just and proper.
Source reference: p. 2Issues
Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of compensation required enhancement to provide just and fair compensation to the claimant.
Source reference: pp. 2–4If so, what enhanced amount and interest should be awarded.
Source reference: pp. 4–5Law Applied
Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides for an appeal against an award of a Claims Tribunal.
Source reference: p. 1Compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act must be just and fair, assessed on a liberal and realistic basis, and aimed—so far as money can—to address the loss sustained by the injured claimant. The Tribunal must endeavour to award just compensation, irrespective of the amount claimed.
Source reference: pp. 3–4Reasoning
The Court accepted that the Tribunal had erred in assessing compensation and concluded that enhancement was warranted.
Source reference: p. 4It recalculated the compensation as Rs. 14,09,500, comprising future loss of income, loss of actual income, pain, shock and suffering, medical expenses, and special diet, attendant charges and transportation. After deducting the Rs. 5,53,500 already awarded, it determined that an additional Rs. 8,56,000 was payable.
Source reference: p. 4Holding
The appeal was partly allowed.
The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced compensation of Rs. 8,56,000, with interest at 9% per annum from the date of the claim petition until realization, before the Tribunal within eight weeks of receiving the order; the Tribunal’s remaining directions were maintained.
Source reference: pp. 4–5The Tribunal was directed to disburse the awarded amount, with accrued interest, to the claimant after verification and to deduct any unpaid court fees in accordance with law.
Source reference: p. 5Acts & Sections Cited
1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Motor Vehicles Act, 19881
Original Court PDF
SAYBABHAI @ AAYAMBHAI NATHABHAI GAMARvsLATIFBHAI KASAMBHAI NANDASANIYA
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
