Facts
The petitioner sought a writ directing the Superintendent of Madurai Central Prison to grant her husband, S. Raja, an undertrial prisoner in S.C. No. 709 of 2025, thirty days’ emergency leave to attend his deceased father’s funeral.
Source reference: p.1–5The petition described the deceased as Raja’s father; the petitioner’s counsel referred to him as her father-in-law.
Source reference: p.1–5The State and CBI opposed the request by relying on the applicable prison rules, prior court directions and related circulars.
Source reference: p.1–5The writ petition was dismissed, with liberty granted to seek bail from the trial court.
Source reference: p.5–6Issues
1. Whether the High Court should direct the grant of thirty days’ emergency leave to an undertrial prisoner to attend a close relative’s funeral.
Source reference: p.1–32. Whether the petitioner should instead seek bail or interim bail from the concerned trial court for the requested purpose.
Source reference: p.5–6Law Applied
Rule 35 of the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982, was relied on for the position that emergency leave under those Rules is unavailable to undertrial prisoners.
Source reference: p.3The Court also noted the Division Bench decision in W.P. No. 14244 of 2025, dated 18 April 2025, which directed that undertrial prisoners be permitted to attend the burial or funeral of close relatives, as defined by the Rules, without being compelled to obtain interim bail.
Source reference: p.3The Director General of Prisons and Correctional Services issued a circular dated 18 July 2025 following that decision.
Source reference: p.3–4The Court further referred to a Registry circular dated 25 November 2024 stating that undertrial prisoners seeking bail in such special circumstances should approach the concerned trial court or Magistrate, rather than the High Court.
Source reference: p.5Reasoning
The Court considered the request for emergency leave against Rule 35 and the directions and circulars concerning undertrial prisoners’ attendance at relatives’ funerals.
Source reference: p.3–6It also noted the Registry’s direction that applications for bail in special circumstances be made to the trial court.
Source reference: p.3–6Rather than grant the requested leave by writ, the Court dismissed the petition and left the petitioner to pursue the available bail remedy before the competent trial court.
Source reference: p.3–6Holding
The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking thirty days’ emergency leave.
It granted the petitioner liberty to apply for bail before the concerned trial court and directed that, if an application is filed, the trial court consider and decide it on its own merits and in accordance with law.
Source reference: p.6Original Court PDF
VijayalakshmivsThe Union of India rep by
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
