Chhattisgarh High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Unsubstantiated employment evidence permits assessment of a deceased’s income by applicable minimum wages.

SMT. BASANTI BAI vs PRADEEP KUMAR SAHU

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 01, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Unsubstantiated employment evidence permits assessment of a deceased’s income by applicable minimum wages.. SMT. BASANTI BAI vs PRADEEP KUMAR SAHU. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The appellants, the deceased’s mother, father and minor sister, sought enhancement of compensation for the death of 18-year-old Vinay Kumar Banjare in a road accident on 30 September 2023.

Source reference: para. 1

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 14,92,800.

Source reference: para. 1

In appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, the claimants argued that the Tribunal had undervalued the deceased’s income and awarded too little under conventional heads.

Source reference: para. 2

They relied on a certificate stating that he earned Rs. 700 per day as a cook and on testimony from the dhaba owner.

Source reference: para. 2
02

Issues

1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of the deceased’s income should be enhanced in light of the income certificate and the dhaba owner’s testimony

Source reference: paras. 2, 5

2. Whether the compensation under conventional heads should be enhanced

Source reference: paras. 2, 6
03

Law Applied

Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides for an appeal against a Claims Tribunal award.

Source reference: para. 1

In assessing fatal-accident compensation, the Court relied on National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, Sarla Verma & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Ors., and Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram & Ors. for the principles governing future prospects, deduction for personal expenses, multiplier, and conventional heads.

Source reference: para. 7

The Court assessed income by reference to the applicable Chhattisgarh minimum-wage notification where the claimed employment and earnings were not adequately proved.

Source reference: para. 5
04

Reasoning

The Court found the claimed income of Rs. 700 per day was not established: the dhaba owner produced no licence, business or wage records, and the certificate was neither on the stated letterhead nor supported by a registration number.

Source reference: para. 5

The owner also said the certificate had been issued at the deceased’s mother’s request.

Source reference: para. 5

The Court therefore assessed monthly income at Rs. 9,960 under the applicable minimum-wage notification.

Source reference: para. 5

Applying 40% for future prospects, a 50% deduction for personal expenses, and a multiplier of 18, it calculated loss of dependency at Rs. 15,05,952.

Source reference: para. 5

It also increased compensation under conventional heads from Rs. 1,32,000 to Rs. 1,80,000.

Source reference: paras. 5–7
05

Holding

The appeal was partly allowed.

Total compensation was enhanced from Rs. 14,92,800 to Rs. 16,85,952, leaving an additional award of Rs. 1,93,152, with interest at 6% per annum from the date the claim application was filed until realization.

Source reference: paras. 8–9

The minor sister was held entitled to Rs. 48,000 out of the total award; the remaining terms of the Tribunal’s award were left unchanged.

Source reference: paras. 8–9
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

SMT. BASANTI BAIvsPRADEEP KUMAR SAHU

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 01, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment