Uttarakhand High CourtAdministrative and Public LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Uttarakhand HC Directs PSC To Recommend Geography Candidate If Her Merit Warrants Inclusion, As Related Case’s Interim Order No Longer Blocks It

PARUL SHARMAv.UTTARAKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Uttarakhand HC Directs PSC To Recommend Geography Candidate If Her Merit Warrants Inclusion, As Related Case’s Interim Order No Longer Blocks It. PARUL SHARMA vs UTTARAKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. Uttarakhand High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the interim order in WPSB No. 138 of 2022 continued to prevent the Commission from recommending the petitioner after that petition was finally disposed of.

The court held

The Court disposed of the writ petition and directed the Secretary of the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission to include the petitioner’s name in the select list, if warranted by her merit, and make an appropriate recommendation to the State Government.

It also directed

The Secretary was expected to pass the necessary order within six weeks.

01Facts

The petitioner participated in the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission’s selection for Assistant Professor (Geography).

Although her writ petition initially sought several forms of relief concerning the selection process, her counsel stated that those claims were not pressed; the remaining grievance was that she had not been recommended for appointment because of an interim order in WPSB No. 138 of 2022.

¶ 2

That earlier petition was disposed of on the same date, with a direction to the State Government to examine the petitioners’ claims for regularization.

¶ 2–4

The petitioner contended that the interim order had therefore merged into the final order and that sufficient vacancies remained.

¶ 2–4

02Issues

i.1. Whether the interim order in WPSB No. 138 of 2022 continued to prevent the Commission from recommending the petitioner after that petition was finally disposed of.

¶ 2, 4

ii.2. Whether the Commission should be directed to include the petitioner in the select list and recommend her for appointment, subject to her merit.

¶ 5

03Law Applied

The Court applied the principle that an interim order merges into the final order when the proceeding in which it was made is finally disposed of; accordingly, the interim order no longer independently governs the parties after disposal.

¶ 4

The Court also made any direction for inclusion in the select list conditional on the petitioner being entitled to inclusion according to her merit.

¶ 5

No statute or precedent was cited.

04Reasoning

WPSB No. 138 of 2022 had been disposed of by a final order on the same date.

¶ 4

The Court therefore held that the interim order in that proceeding had merged into the final order and no longer prevented the Commission from making a recommendation in the petitioner’s favour.

¶ 4

Because entitlement to selection remained dependent on merit, the Court directed inclusion only if the petitioner was otherwise entitled to it.

¶ 5

05Holding

The Court disposed of the writ petition and directed the Secretary of the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission to include the petitioner’s name in the select list, if warranted by her merit, and make an appropriate recommendation to the State Government.

¶ 5

The Secretary was expected to pass the necessary order within six weeks.

¶ 5
Uttarakhand High Court

Original Court PDF

PARUL SHARMAvsUTTARAKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Uttarakhand High Court · October 26, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment