Facts
The applicant was facing trial in Special Session Trial No. 49 of 2025, arising from Case Crime No. 320 of 2024, for offences under Section 376 IPC read with Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act
Source reference: para. 4The victim was a minor at the time of the alleged incident.
Source reference: para. 4The applicant and victim later married in a Gurudwara on 19 April 2026; the victim and her mother, the informant, stated that they did not wish to continue the prosecution
Source reference: paras. 7–8The applicant petitioned under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023, seeking quashing of the proceedings, supported by a compounding application
Source reference: para. 4Issues
Whether the High Court should quash the pending prosecution under Section 528 of the BNSS where the offences were non-compoundable and the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged incident, but she later married the applicant
Source reference: paras. 9–11Whether, in light of the marriage and the victim’s and informant’s stated wishes, continuing the trial would serve any useful purpose
Source reference: paras. 8–10Law Applied
Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023, was invoked as the basis for the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction to quash the proceedings
Source reference: paras. 4, 11The alleged offences were under Section 376 IPC read with Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act
Source reference: para. 4The State submitted that these offences were non-compoundable
Source reference: para. 9The judgment cited no precedent or further legal test governing the exercise of the Court’s inherent jurisdiction
Source reference: no citationReasoning
The Court considered that the applicant and victim had married, that their families accepted the marriage, and that the victim and her mother did not wish to proceed with the trial.
Source reference: paras. 7–9Although the State noted that the offences were non-compoundable and the victim had been a minor at the time of the alleged incident, it did not oppose quashing in the circumstances presented.
Source reference: para. 9On that basis, the Court concluded that continuing the proceedings would be a futile exercise.
Source reference: para. 10Holding
The Court allowed the petition under Section 528 of the BNSS and the compounding application
quashed the entire proceeding in Special Session Trial No. 49 of 2025 arising from Case Crime No. 320 of 2024, pending before the 1st Additional Sessions Judge/FTSC (POCSO), Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar
Source reference: para. 11Acts & Sections Cited
4 provisions across 3 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231
Indian Penal Code, 18601
Original Court PDF
PRINCE SINGHvsSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
