Uttarakhand High Court
Criminal LawCriminal Procedure and Evidence

Uttarakhand High Court quashes rape and POCSO trial after accused marries victim who was a minor at the time of the incident

PRINCE SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Uttarakhand High CourtJUDGMENT: September 29, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Uttarakhand High Court quashes rape and POCSO trial after accused marries victim who was a minor at the time of the incident. PRINCE SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND. Uttarakhand High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant was facing trial in Special Session Trial No. 49 of 2025, arising from Case Crime No. 320 of 2024, for offences under Section 376 IPC read with Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act

Source reference: para. 4

The victim was a minor at the time of the alleged incident.

Source reference: para. 4

The applicant and victim later married in a Gurudwara on 19 April 2026; the victim and her mother, the informant, stated that they did not wish to continue the prosecution

Source reference: paras. 7–8

The applicant petitioned under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023, seeking quashing of the proceedings, supported by a compounding application

Source reference: para. 4
02

Issues

Whether the High Court should quash the pending prosecution under Section 528 of the BNSS where the offences were non-compoundable and the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged incident, but she later married the applicant

Source reference: paras. 9–11

Whether, in light of the marriage and the victim’s and informant’s stated wishes, continuing the trial would serve any useful purpose

Source reference: paras. 8–10
03

Law Applied

Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023, was invoked as the basis for the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction to quash the proceedings

Source reference: paras. 4, 11

The alleged offences were under Section 376 IPC read with Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act

Source reference: para. 4

The State submitted that these offences were non-compoundable

Source reference: para. 9

The judgment cited no precedent or further legal test governing the exercise of the Court’s inherent jurisdiction

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The Court considered that the applicant and victim had married, that their families accepted the marriage, and that the victim and her mother did not wish to proceed with the trial.

Source reference: paras. 7–9

Although the State noted that the offences were non-compoundable and the victim had been a minor at the time of the alleged incident, it did not oppose quashing in the circumstances presented.

Source reference: para. 9

On that basis, the Court concluded that continuing the proceedings would be a futile exercise.

Source reference: para. 10
05

Holding

The Court allowed the petition under Section 528 of the BNSS and the compounding application

quashed the entire proceeding in Special Session Trial No. 49 of 2025 arising from Case Crime No. 320 of 2024, pending before the 1st Additional Sessions Judge/FTSC (POCSO), Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar

Source reference: para. 11
06

Acts & Sections Cited

4 provisions across 3 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231

Indian Penal Code, 18601

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 20122

Uttarakhand High Court

Original Court PDF

PRINCE SINGHvsSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Uttarakhand High Court · September 29, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment