Central Administrative Tribunal
Employment and Labour LawCriminal Law

VIGILANCE CLEARANCE DENIAL REQUIRES PENDING CHARGE SHEET OR SUSPENSION, NOT MERE INVESTIGATION.

O.A. No. 060/907/2020

Central Administrative Tribunal1 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
VIGILANCE CLEARANCE DENIAL REQUIRES PENDING CHARGE SHEET OR SUSPENSION, NOT MERE INVESTIGATION.. O.A. No. 060/907/2020. Central Administrative Tribunal. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Mukesh Sisodia, joined BSNL as a Junior Telecom Officer on December 1, 2001, and his services were regularized on March 1, 2002.

Source reference: para. 2

On March 22, 2018, FIR No. 133 was registered against him under Sections 186, 332, 353, and 506 IPC.

Source reference: para. 2

He was arrested on March 23, 2018.

Source reference: para. 2
02

Issues

no issues provided

Source reference: no citation
03

Law Applied

no rule of law provided

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

no analysis provided

Source reference: no citation
05

Holding

no conclusion and holding provided
06

Acts & Sections Cited

8 provisions across 4 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Administrative Tribunals Act, 19851

Prevention of Corruption Act, 19881

Code of Criminal Procedure, 19732

Central Administrative Tribunal

Original Court PDF

O.A. No. 060/907/2020

Central Administrative Tribunal

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment