Karnataka High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Whole-body disability is assessed at one-third of lower-limb disability when calculating loss of future income.

SRI. M. NAGARAJA vs M/S NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.,

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: September 25, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Whole-body disability is assessed at one-third of lower-limb disability when calculating loss of future income.. SRI. M. NAGARAJA vs M/S NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.,. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The claimant sustained a comminuted fracture of the left tibia and a head laceration in a road accident on 6 May 2024, allegedly caused by the negligent driving of a car.

Source reference: p. 2, para. 2; p. 4, para. 6

The Tribunal awarded him ₹7,10,476 with interest at 6% per annum.

Source reference: pp. 2–3

He appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement.

Source reference: p. 3, para. 3

The High Court considered, among other matters, his age, occupation as a driver, period of hospitalisation, and assessed disability.

Source reference: pp. 4–5, paras. 5–8
02

Issues

1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of compensation for pain and suffering, loss of amenities, and loss of income during the laid-up period required enhancement.

Source reference: pp. 4–5, para. 7

2. Whether the claimant’s whole-body disability and resulting loss of future income had been correctly assessed by the Tribunal.

Source reference: p. 5, para. 8
03

Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which provides for an appeal against an award of a Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: p. 2

In assessing compensation, the Court applied the multiplier method to calculate loss of future income, using the claimant’s annual income, age-based multiplier, and percentage of whole-body disability.

Source reference: p. 5, para. 8

It treated disability assessed at 48% of the lower limb as equivalent to 16% whole-body disability, applying a one-third conversion.

Source reference: p. 5, para. 8

The Court also assessed compensation under the relevant heads of pain and suffering, loss of amenities, medical expenses, laid-up-period income, and transportation, nourishment, conveyance, and attendant charges.

Source reference: pp. 4–6, paras. 7–9
04

Reasoning

The Court accepted the multiplier of 13 for the claimant, aged 49 at the time of the accident, but substituted the 2024 notional monthly income of ₹17,000 for the Tribunal’s figure of ₹16,500.

Source reference: p. 4, para. 5

Given the injuries, ten-day hospitalisation, and occupation as a driver, it assessed a three-month laid-up period and increased the corresponding income loss to ₹51,000.

Source reference: p. 5, para. 7

It adopted the doctor’s 48% lower-limb disability assessment and converted it to 16% whole-body disability, calculating future income loss at ₹4,24,320 (₹17,000 × 12 × 13 × 16%).

Source reference: p. 5, para. 8

It also enhanced pain and suffering and loss of amenities, while leaving medical expenses and other charges unchanged.

Source reference: pp. 4–6, paras. 7–9
05

Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

The Court enhanced the total compensation from ₹7,10,476 to ₹8,66,916, granting an additional ₹1,56,440 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realisation.

Source reference: pp. 6–7, paras. 10–11

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount with interest before the Tribunal within six weeks, and the claimant was permitted to withdraw the entire enhanced compensation.

Source reference: p. 7, para. 11
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SRI. M. NAGARAJAvsM/S NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.,

Karnataka High Court · September 25, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment