Facts
The applicants, 106 individuals employed as Nursing Officers and Senior Nursing Officers within the Employee State Insurance Corporation (ESIC), filed this Original Application (OA) to challenge the transfer policy dated December 24, 2022
Source reference: p. 1-15, para. 1During the pendency of the litigation, the respondents issued a revised transfer policy in 2024, which superseded the impugned policy of 2022
Source reference: p. 16, para. 1In light of this development, the applicants sought the Tribunal's permission to withdraw the current OA while reserving the liberty to file a fresh challenge against the revised policy if necessary
Source reference: p. 16, para. 1Issues
Whether the applicants may be permitted to withdraw the Original Application with liberty to agitate their grievances afresh following the issuance of a revised transfer policy
Source reference: p. 16, para. 1-3Law Applied
The Tribunal followed standard procedural law regarding the withdrawal of a suit/application when an impugned administrative order or policy is superseded by a subsequent act of the executive, rendering the original challenge infructuous but allowing for the preservation of the right to challenge the new act
Source reference: p. 16, para. 1-3Reasoning
The Tribunal considered the submission that the impugned transfer policy of December 24, 2022, had been replaced by a revised policy in 2024
Source reference: p. 16, para. 1Because the regulatory framework governing the applicants' transfers had changed during the proceedings, the original cause of action based on the 2022 policy was modified by the subsequent 2024 policy
Source reference: p. 16, para. 1The Tribunal determined that allowing the withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition was appropriate to ensure the applicants could legally address the impact of the newly implemented 2024 policy
Source reference: p. 16, para. 2-3Holding
The Tribunal granted the applicants' request for withdrawal
The Original Application was dismissed as withdrawn, and the Tribunal explicitly granted liberty to the applicants to agitate their grievances afresh in accordance with the law
Source reference: p. 16, para. 3No order was passed regarding costs
Source reference: p. 16, para. 4Original Court PDF
BABITA RANIvsLABOUR
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in