Facts
The Petitioner, a Second-in-Commandant in the Border Security Force (BSF), submitted an application for Voluntary Retirement from Service (VRS) on 09.05.2023, effective 31.07.2023.
Source reference: para. 3The Respondents returned this application because it failed to satisfy the mandatory three-month notice period under Rule 43(1) of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021.
Source reference: para. 3, 5Subsequently, the Petitioner submitted a fresh application on 23.06.2023, seeking VRS effective 31.08.2023.
Source reference: para. 3The Respondents accepted this notice via a letter dated 25.08.2023.
Source reference: para. 3On 28.08.2023—three days prior to the effective date—the Petitioner submitted a representation to withdraw his VRS notice.
Source reference: para. 4The Respondents rejected this withdrawal on 31.08.2023, citing the Petitioner's failure to comply with the 15-day notice requirement for withdrawal of VRS.
Source reference: para. 2, 6Issues
1. Whether the Respondents were justified in rejecting the Petitioner’s request for withdrawal of VRS on the grounds that it was submitted less than 15 days before the intended date of retirement.
Source reference: para. 11, 132. Whether the Petitioner's right to withdraw his VRS application remains absolute until the effective date of retirement notwithstanding the statutory time limits under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021.
Source reference: para. 14, 16Law Applied
The court primarily applied Rule 43(6) of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2021, which stipulates that a request for withdrawal of a notice for voluntary retirement must be made at least 15 days before the intended date of retirement.
Source reference: para. 6, 13The court also considered Rule 43(1) regarding the mandatory three-month notice period for VRS.
Source reference: para. 5The court distinguished the Supreme Court’s decision in S.D. Manohara v. Konkan Railway Corporation Limited & Others (2024 INSC 693), which dealt with internal communications and lack of finality in resignation.
Source reference: para. 17, 21The court distinguished the Delhi High Court decision in Birander Singh Ex DC v. Union of India & Others (2025:DHC:8315-DB), where the 15-day withdrawal notice requirement had been met.
Source reference: para. 22-24Reasoning
The Court rejected the Petitioner’s argument that he could only withdraw the application after receiving formal acceptance on 25.08.2023, noting that nothing prevented him from withdrawing his request anytime between 23.06.2023 and the 15-day cutoff prior to 31.08.2023.
Source reference: para. 15While acknowledging the general legal principle that an employee may typically withdraw a VRS request before the effective date, the Court held that this right is subject to specific statutory provisions.
Source reference: para. 16In this case, Rule 43(6) of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021, explicitly mandates a 15-day window for withdrawal.
Source reference: para. 16Since the Petitioner submitted his withdrawal request only three days before the effective date, the court found it was hit by the statutory bar.
Source reference: para. 13, 16The Court distinguished the Petitioner’s cited precedents, noting that S.D. Manohara involved unique factual circumstances regarding the service of the acceptance letter, and Birander Singh involved a petitioner who had complied with the 15-day timeline, unlike the present case.
Source reference: para. 21, 24Holding
The Court held that the Respondents were justified in rejecting the withdrawal of the VRS notice as the Petitioner failed to comply with the mandatory 15-day period prescribed under Rule 43(6) of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021.
The Court found no merit in the Petitioner’s challenge to the acceptance of the VRS or the rejection of the withdrawal.
Source reference: para. 25The writ petition was dismissed.
Source reference: para. 25Original Court PDF
Rajesh BhandoriavsUnion Of India And Ors
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in