Karnataka High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

A 25% functional disability warranted 40% future prospects in calculating loss of future income.

SHWETHA L P vs SIDDARAJA R

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 05, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
A 25% functional disability warranted 40% future prospects in calculating loss of future income.. SHWETHA L P vs SIDDARAJA R. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The claimant sustained injuries in a road accident on 14 January 2022, allegedly caused by the negligent driving of a car.

Source reference: pp. 2–4, paras. 1, 3–5

She sought compensation before the MACT, which awarded ₹12,42,469, including ₹5,95,200 for loss of future income, and directed the insurer to pay.

Source reference: pp. 2–4, paras. 1, 3–5

On appeal, the claimant sought enhancement.

Source reference: pp. 2–4, paras. 1, 3–5

The High Court considered her injuries, the medical evidence on disability, and the compensation awarded under the different heads.

Source reference: pp. 4–6, paras. 8–12
02

Issues

1. Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal required enhancement in light of the claimant’s injuries and evidence concerning disability.

Source reference: pp. 4–6, paras. 8–12

2. Whether the claimant’s functional disability and entitlement to future prospects justified recalculation of loss of future income.

Source reference: p. 6, para. 12
03

Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act.

Source reference: p. 2

In assessing compensation, the Court considered the claimant’s age, notional income, applicable multiplier, functional disability, and the evidence of the treating/examining doctors.

Source reference: pp. 4, 6, paras. 7, 12

It held, on the facts of this case, that where the disability adopted for calculation exceeded 20%, the claimant was entitled to 40% future prospects.

Source reference: pp. 4, 6, paras. 7, 12

No precedent was cited.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The Court accepted the Tribunal’s notional income of ₹15,500 per month and multiplier of 16, but, having regard to the medical evidence and the claimant’s occupation, assessed her functional disability at 25%, rather than the 20% used by the Tribunal.

Source reference: p. 6, para. 12

It applied 40% future prospects and recalculated loss of future income as ₹10,41,600.

Source reference: p. 6, para. 12

The Court also enhanced pain and suffering from ₹60,000 to ₹1,20,000, loss of amenities from ₹25,000 to ₹80,000, and future medical expenses from ₹15,000 to ₹30,000, while affirming the other heads.

Source reference: pp. 5–7, paras. 9–11, 13
05

Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

The Court increased the total compensation to ₹18,18,869, granting enhanced compensation of ₹5,76,400 over the Tribunal’s award, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realisation.

Source reference: pp. 7–8, paras. 13–17

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount with interest within six weeks; 50% of the compensation was to be released to the claimant, with the balance placed in a three-year fixed deposit.

Source reference: p. 8, para. 17
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SHWETHA L PvsSIDDARAJA R

Karnataka High Court · October 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment