Facts
On 12 August 2017, Shankar, aged 22 and a B.E. graduate, died after a car collided with the motorcycle he was riding
Source reference: p. 2, p. 6His parents, Jayanthi and Kumar, sought compensation before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal.
Source reference: p. 3The Tribunal awarded ₹13,30,200, including ₹12,85,200 for loss of earning, and directed the insurer to pay
Source reference: p. 3, p. 4The parents appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement, principally on the ground that the Tribunal had assessed the deceased’s monthly income at only ₹8,500
Source reference: p. 1, p. 3, p. 4Issues
Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of the deceased’s income at ₹8,500 per month should be revised, having regard to his engineering qualification and the precedent cited by the appellants.
Source reference: p. 4, p. 6Whether the amounts awarded under the other heads of compensation, including transportation and loss of love and affection, required enhancement.
Source reference: p. 4, p. 6Law Applied
Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides for an appeal against an award of a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal.
Source reference: p. 1In Basanti Devi v. Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited and others, 2022 (1) TN MAC 148 (SC), the Supreme Court held that, considering a deceased’s qualification as a Bachelor of Engineering in Computer Technology and earning potential, income could be assessed at least at ₹20,000 per month even without supporting documentary evidence.
Source reference: p. 5, p. 6In assessing compensation here, the Court also applied a 40% addition for future prospects, a multiplier of 18, and a 50% deduction for the deceased bachelor’s personal expenses.
Source reference: p. 6Reasoning
The accident and negligence were undisputed, so the appeal concerned only quantum.
Source reference: p. 4Applying Basanti Devi to the deceased’s B.E. qualification and the 2017 accident, the Court fixed his monthly income at ₹20,000.
Source reference: p. 6It affirmed the Tribunal’s 40% addition for future prospects and multiplier of 18, and deducted half for personal expenses, resulting in ₹30,24,000 for loss of earning.
Source reference: p. 6The Court considered transportation expenses of ₹5,000 inadequate and increased them to ₹10,000; it also awarded ₹88,000 for loss of love and affection to the parents, at ₹44,000 each.
Source reference: p. 6, p. 7It confirmed the remaining heads.
Source reference: p. 7Holding
The Court partly allowed the appeal and enhanced the total compensation from ₹13,30,200 to ₹31,62,000, with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of the petition until realization.
It directed the insurer to deposit the modified award within eight weeks, subject to payment of any requisite court fee, and permitted the claimants to withdraw their apportioned shares after deducting sums already withdrawn.
Source reference: p. 8, p. 9No costs were awarded.
Source reference: p. 8, p. 9Acts & Sections Cited
1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Motor Vehicles Act, 19881
Original Court PDF
JAYANTHIvsK.K.SHANMUGAM
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
