Madras High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

A B.E. graduate’s notional income may be assessed at ₹20,000 per month for compensation.

JAYANTHI vs K.K.SHANMUGAM

Madras High CourtJUDGMENT: October 07, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
A B.E. graduate’s notional income may be assessed at ₹20,000 per month for compensation.. JAYANTHI vs K.K.SHANMUGAM. Madras High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

On 12 August 2017, Shankar, aged 22 and a B.E. graduate, died after a car collided with the motorcycle he was riding

Source reference: p. 2, p. 6

His parents, Jayanthi and Kumar, sought compensation before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: p. 3

The Tribunal awarded ₹13,30,200, including ₹12,85,200 for loss of earning, and directed the insurer to pay

Source reference: p. 3, p. 4

The parents appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement, principally on the ground that the Tribunal had assessed the deceased’s monthly income at only ₹8,500

Source reference: p. 1, p. 3, p. 4
02

Issues

Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of the deceased’s income at ₹8,500 per month should be revised, having regard to his engineering qualification and the precedent cited by the appellants.

Source reference: p. 4, p. 6

Whether the amounts awarded under the other heads of compensation, including transportation and loss of love and affection, required enhancement.

Source reference: p. 4, p. 6
03

Law Applied

Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides for an appeal against an award of a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: p. 1

In Basanti Devi v. Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited and others, 2022 (1) TN MAC 148 (SC), the Supreme Court held that, considering a deceased’s qualification as a Bachelor of Engineering in Computer Technology and earning potential, income could be assessed at least at ₹20,000 per month even without supporting documentary evidence.

Source reference: p. 5, p. 6

In assessing compensation here, the Court also applied a 40% addition for future prospects, a multiplier of 18, and a 50% deduction for the deceased bachelor’s personal expenses.

Source reference: p. 6
04

Reasoning

The accident and negligence were undisputed, so the appeal concerned only quantum.

Source reference: p. 4

Applying Basanti Devi to the deceased’s B.E. qualification and the 2017 accident, the Court fixed his monthly income at ₹20,000.

Source reference: p. 6

It affirmed the Tribunal’s 40% addition for future prospects and multiplier of 18, and deducted half for personal expenses, resulting in ₹30,24,000 for loss of earning.

Source reference: p. 6

The Court considered transportation expenses of ₹5,000 inadequate and increased them to ₹10,000; it also awarded ₹88,000 for loss of love and affection to the parents, at ₹44,000 each.

Source reference: p. 6, p. 7

It confirmed the remaining heads.

Source reference: p. 7
05

Holding

The Court partly allowed the appeal and enhanced the total compensation from ₹13,30,200 to ₹31,62,000, with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of the petition until realization.

It directed the insurer to deposit the modified award within eight weeks, subject to payment of any requisite court fee, and permitted the claimants to withdraw their apportioned shares after deducting sums already withdrawn.

Source reference: p. 8, p. 9

No costs were awarded.

Source reference: p. 8, p. 9
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

JAYANTHIvsK.K.SHANMUGAM

Madras High Court · October 07, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment