Karnataka High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

A coolie with femur and tibia fractures is entitled to four months’ laid-up income compensation.

RAHIL PASHA @ RAHIL vs SANDEEPA M S

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 12, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
A coolie with femur and tibia fractures is entitled to four months’ laid-up income compensation.. RAHIL PASHA @ RAHIL vs SANDEEPA M S. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The claimant sought compensation for injuries sustained in a road accident on 14 June 2022, allegedly caused by the negligent driving of a car owned by respondent No. 1.

Source reference: p. 3

The Tribunal awarded total compensation of Rs. 9,41,466, including Rs. 5,47,978 for future loss of income, and interest at 6% per annum.

Source reference: pp. 3–4

The claimant appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement.

Source reference: p. 2

The High Court noted that he had sustained fractures of the femur and tibia, and that the doctor assessed disability at 17.33% to the whole body.

Source reference: pp. 4–5
02

Issues

Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal required enhancement under the heads of pain and suffering, loss of amenities, and loss of income during the laid-up period.

Source reference: pp. 4–6

Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of future loss of income, including its assessment of disability, required interference.

Source reference: p. 5
03

Law Applied

The appeal was considered under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which provides for an appeal against an award of a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: p. 2

The Court assessed whether the compensation awarded for the claimant’s injuries and resulting losses was just and proper, taking account of the injuries, disability, age, avocation, and period of recuperation.

Source reference: pp. 4–5

No precedent was cited.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The Court found the Tribunal’s use of multiplier 17, notional monthly income of Rs. 15,500, and whole-body disability of 17.33% appropriate; it therefore left the future-loss-of-income award unchanged.

Source reference: pp. 4–5

Given the fractures and the claimant’s work as a coolie, the Court considered four months’ rest reasonable and increased laid-up-period income to Rs. 62,000, an enhancement of Rs. 52,000 over the Tribunal’s award.

Source reference: p. 5

It also increased pain-and-suffering compensation from Rs. 15,000 to Rs. 60,000 and loss-of-amenities compensation from Rs. 10,000 to Rs. 50,000, producing respective enhancements of Rs. 45,000 and Rs. 40,000.

Source reference: pp. 4–6

It found no reason to alter the awards for attendant, conveyance, food and nourishment, or loss of life expectancy.

Source reference: p. 5
05

Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

The claimant was awarded enhanced compensation of Rs. 1,37,000, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization.

Source reference: p. 6

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount with interest before the Tribunal within six weeks, and the claimant was permitted to withdraw the entire enhancement.

Source reference: p. 6
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

RAHIL PASHA @ RAHILvsSANDEEPA M S

Karnataka High Court · October 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment