Facts
First Energy Private Limited, owner of materials for a wind-power project, engaged Everrenew Energy Private Limited as EPC contractor. Everrenew subcontracted transportation to V.K.S. Transports.
Source reference: para. 2–5, 16–17In November 2025, the materials were loaded into 17 vehicles at First Energy’s stockyard, but V.K.S. refused to move them, citing unpaid dues owed to it by Everrenew.
Source reference: para. 2–5, 16–17First Energy alleged that it had paid Everrenew in full, offered to pay the freight directly or have the goods unloaded, and lodged a police complaint. An FIR was registered against the transport company and its partners under Sections 61(1), 316(3) and 318(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
Source reference: para. 1, 5, 9–12The accused sought to quash the FIR under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, relying on a carrier’s lien and describing the dispute as civil.
Source reference: para. 1, 5, 9–12They also sought recall of an earlier order directing production of the transport bills, payment of the charges by First Energy, and delivery of the goods.
Source reference: para. 6–8, 35–36Issues
1. Whether the transport company could rely on a carrier’s lien to retain goods belonging to First Energy for unpaid dues allegedly owed by Everrenew, where the goods had not been transported to their destination.
Source reference: para. 18, 21–262. Whether the FIR disclosed cognizable offences warranting investigation, or should be quashed as arising from a civil or commercial dispute.
Source reference: para. 40–443. Whether the earlier order concerning production of bills and delivery of the goods should be recalled.
Source reference: para. 35–36, 45Law Applied
Section 15(4) of the Carriage by Road Act, 2007 permits a common carrier to detain or dispose of a consignment to recover freight and other charges where the consignee fails to pay at the time of taking delivery; the Court held that this right arises after the goods have been carried to their destination.
Source reference: para. 21–26Section 170 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 provides a bailee with a particular lien for remuneration for services rendered in respect of the goods, while Section 171
Acts & Sections Cited
8 provisions across 5 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20233
Carriage by Road Act, 20071
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.1
Indian Contract Act, 18722
Original Court PDF
M/s.V.K.S.TranspoertsvsThe State Of Tamilnadu Rep B
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
