Delhi High Court
Criminal Procedure and EvidenceFamily Law

A Voluntary, Fully Performed Matrimonial Settlement Justifies Quashing Criminal Proceedings.

Mintu Kumar And Ors vs State Of Nct Of Delhi And Anr

Delhi High CourtJUDGMENT: October 01, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
A Voluntary, Fully Performed Matrimonial Settlement Justifies Quashing Criminal Proceedings.. Mintu Kumar And Ors vs State Of Nct Of Delhi And Anr. Delhi High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 0656/2024, registered at Police Station Nand Nagri under Sections 85, 316(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, together with all consequential proceedings

Source reference: para. 1

The request was based on a settlement reached under the aegis of a Counsellor at the Family Court, Shahdara District, Karkardooma

Source reference: para. 2

The complainant appeared before the Court, acknowledged receipt of the full settlement amount, confirmed that no settlement obligation remained outstanding, and stated that the agreement was voluntary and that she had no objection to quashing the proceedings against all five petitioners

Source reference: para. 3
02

Issues

Whether the FIR and consequential proceedings could be quashed on the basis of the parties’ settlement in a dispute arising from a matrimonial relationship

Source reference: paras. 1, 4–5

Whether the complainant’s confirmation that the settlement was voluntary, fully performed, and made without coercion supported quashing the proceedings against all five petitioners

Source reference: para. 3
03

Law Applied

The Court applied the Supreme Court’s decision in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303, concerning the High Court’s power to quash criminal proceedings in appropriate cases involving a settlement between the parties

Source reference: para. 5

The proceedings arose under Sections 85, 316(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961

Source reference: para. 1
04

Reasoning

The Court noted that the dispute arose from a matrimonial relationship and had been resolved by the persons directly affected, namely petitioner no. 1 and the complainant

Source reference: para. 4

The complainant confirmed that she had received the entire settlement amount, that no obligations remained, and that she had entered into the agreement voluntarily and without pressure or coercion; she also expressly consented to quashing the proceedings against all five petitioners

Source reference: para. 3

Applying Gian Singh, the Court found no impediment to granting the parties’ joint request

Source reference: para. 5
05

Holding

The Court allowed the request and quashed FIR No. 0656/2024 and all consequential proceedings emanating from it

The petition was disposed of, and the pending application was also disposed of

Source reference: para. 6
06

Acts & Sections Cited

5 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20234

Dowry Prohibition Act, 19611

Delhi High Court

Original Court PDF

Mintu Kumar And OrsvsState Of Nct Of Delhi And Anr

Delhi High Court · October 01, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment