Facts
The applicant was arrested on 11.12.2025 in connection with Crime No. 186/2025 after police discovered an unattended Bolero vehicle, registered in the name of the applicant’s wife, containing 4 bottles of liquor and 198 bottle caps
Source reference: para 2, 3, 4The applicant contended that he had lent the vehicle to third parties (Krishu and Pappu) for a medical emergency and was unaware of the illicit activities
Source reference: para 3Following an order by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP (Crl) No. 3432/2026, which expedited the hearing, the High Court considered this first bail application under the new procedural laws
Source reference: para 1, 2Issues
Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS considering the nature of the evidence and his period of incarceration
Source reference: para 2, 7Law Applied
The Court primarily applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which governs the power of the High Court to grant bail
Source reference: para 2The substantive offences were registered under Section 34(1) of the C.G. Excise Act and Sections 281 and 111(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)
Source reference: para 2The Court also noted the sentencing limits under Section 34 of the Excise Act, which range from one to three years
Source reference: para 4Procedural compliance during bail was linked to Sections 209, 269, and 351 of the BNS and Section 84 of the BNSS
Source reference: para 8Reasoning
The Court noted that the applicant had no prior criminal antecedents
Source reference: para 4, 7It evaluated the defense that the vehicle was owned by the applicant's wife and was being used by third parties for a medical purpose at the time of the incident
Source reference: para 4, 7The Court found a lack of evidence to suggest that the applicant had knowledge of or provided assistance in the transportation of the liquor
Source reference: para 7Furthermore, considering the small quantity of contraband (4 bottles) and the applicant’s period of custody since December 2025, the Court reasoned that since the trial would take considerable time, the applicant met the criteria for release
Source reference: para 7Holding
The Court allowed the bail application and ordered the applicant's release upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties
The holding was contingent upon several conditions: the applicant must not seek unnecessary adjournments [para 8(i)], must appear personally for key trial stages including the framing of charges and recording of statements under Section 351 of the BNSS [para 8(iv)], and faces proceedings under Section 209 of the BNS if he fails to appear after a proclamation
Source reference: para 8(iii)Original Court PDF
KAMTA PRASAD SHARMAvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in