Madhya Pradesh High Court

Absence of criminal antecedents warrants bail for suspected spurious liquor possession under M.P. Excise Act.

Babli vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 07, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant was apprehended on 19.02.2026 by Police Station Chimanganj Mandi, Ujjain, following a search based on secret information.

Source reference: p.2

She was allegedly found in possession of five bulk litres of country-made raw liquor, suspected to be spurious and unfit for human consumption, stored in a plastic cane behind an abandoned gumthi.

Source reference: p.2

The applicant failed to produce a valid license or permit for the possession of the liquor.

Source reference: p.2

Consequently, she was charged under Section 49(A) of the M.P. Excise Act and has been in judicial custody since her arrest.

Source reference: p.1

This is the first bail application filed by the applicant.

Source reference: p.1
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, considering her socio-economic background and the nature of the alleged offense?

Source reference: p.1-2
03

Law Applied

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 (corresponding to bail provisions under the erstwhile Cr.P.C.).

Source reference: p.1

Section 49(A) of the M.P. Excise Act regarding the possession of spurious liquor.

Source reference: p.1

Principles of criminal jurisprudence that consider the likelihood of recidivism, the possibility of tampering with evidence, the socio-economic status of the accused, and the triability of the offense by a Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC).

Source reference: p.1-2
04

Reasoning

The Court noted that the investigation was complete and the final report had been submitted.

Source reference: p.1-2

It emphasized that the offense is triable by a JMFC.

Source reference: p.1

Regarding the applicant’s background, the Court observed that she is a 30-year-old labourer with no reported criminal antecedents.

Source reference: p.1

The Court reasoned that due to her socio-economic status, there was no reasonable likelihood of her influencing prosecution witnesses or tampering with evidence.

Source reference: p.2

Furthermore, the Court prioritized the hardship caused by her incarceration to her dependent family and minor children, concluding that there was no compelling reason to continue her detention while the veracity of the prosecution's claims is yet to be determined at trial.

Source reference: p.2
05

Holding

The Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant.

The applicant is to be released upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of the same amount.

Source reference: p.2

The holding is subject to several conditions, including that the applicant shall not commit similar offenses and shall attend all hearing dates.

Source reference: p.3

Critically, the Court directed that if the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report subsequently reveals the presence of poisonous substances in the seized liquor, the bail shall stand cancelled automatically without further reference to the Court.

Source reference: p.4
Madhya Pradesh High Court

Original Court PDF

BablivsThe State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · April 07, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment