Facts
The applicant, Dayanidhi Sav, was arrested on December 20, 2025, in connection with Crime No. 337/2025 registered at Police Station Pusour, District Raigarh
Source reference: para. 1, 3The prosecution alleged that following a raid based on informant data, 30 bulk liters of country-made liquor were seized from the applicant’s possession
Source reference: para. 2Consequently, the applicant was charged under Sections 34(2) and 56(A) of the C.G. Excise Act
Source reference: para. 2The applicant filed this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, arguing he was falsely implicated and highlighting his lack of criminal antecedents
Source reference: para. 1, 3Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, considering the nature of the offence and the duration of his pretrial detention
Source reference: para. 1, 6Law Applied
The court applied Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which provides the High Court with the power to grant bail
Source reference: para. 1Substantively, the case involved Sections 34(2) and 56(A) of the C.G. Excise Act, which prescribe a minimum punishment of one year and a maximum of three years for the unlawful possession of liquor
Source reference: para. 3The court also invoked procedural and penal safeguards under Sections 84, 209, 269, and 351 of the BNSS and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) to ensure the applicant’s compliance with bail conditions
Source reference: para. 7Reasoning
The court evaluated the facts and circumstances by balancing the gravity of the allegations against the applicant's personal liberty. It specifically noted that the applicant had no prior criminal record
Source reference: para. 3, 6Furthermore, the court observed that the charge-sheet had already been filed before the competent court, and the applicant had been incarcerated since December 20, 2025
Source reference: para. 6Given that the maximum punishment for the offence is three years and the trial was expected to take considerable time to conclude, the court reasoned that continued detention was not warranted
Source reference: para. 3, 6The court addressed the State's opposition regarding the quantity of liquor by imposing stringent conditions to ensure the applicant does not misuse his liberty or delay the trial process
Source reference: para. 4, 7Holding
The High Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties
The holding was subject to several conditions: the applicant must not seek adjournments when witnesses are present, must appear personally for framing of charges and recording of statements, and must comply with all trial court dates. Failure to comply would allow the trial court to initiate proceedings under Sections 209 and 269 of the BNS or Section 84 of the BNSS
Source reference: para. 7Original Court PDF
DAYANIDHI SAVvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in