01Facts
The claimant sustained injuries, including fractures to the L3 and C7 vertebrae, in a road traffic accident on 17 December 2017.
pp. 4–5He sought compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
pp. 4–5The MACT awarded ₹4,61,722, including ₹1,95,000 for loss of income during the laid-up period, but made no award for loss of future income due to disability.
pp. 3–4The claimant appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act seeking enhancement.
p. 202Issues
i.1. Whether the claimant was entitled to enhancement of compensation for pain and suffering, attendant and related expenses, and loss of income during the laid-up period.
pp. 5–6ii.2. Whether compensation for loss of future income due to disability was warranted despite the Tribunal’s finding that the claimant’s income had not been reduced.
p. 403Law Applied
The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act.
p. 2The Court assessed compensation by reference to the injuries sustained and the evidence concerning the claimant’s salary, leave taken, and medical expenses.
pp. 5–6It did not cite any precedent or set out a broader legal test; it held that loss of future income was not justified on the evidence where the claimant’s income had not been reduced.
p. 4Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173
04Reasoning
The Court upheld the Tribunal’s refusal to award loss of future income because the evidence did not establish a reduction in the claimant’s income due to his injuries or disability.
p. 4It enhanced pain-and-suffering compensation from ₹25,000 to ₹1,00,000 in view of the spinal injuries, and attendant, conveyance, food and nourishment expenses from ₹25,000 to ₹42,000, reflecting the claimant’s 42-day hospital admission.
p. 5It accepted the medical expenses of ₹1,16,722 and the amenities award of ₹1,00,000 as appropriate.
p. 5For the laid-up period, it assessed monthly salary at ₹65,000, calculated daily income at ₹2,167, and awarded ₹4,29,066 for 198 days of leave taken.
pp. 5–605Holding
The appeal was allowed in part.
pp. 6–7The Court enhanced total compensation to ₹7,87,788, an increase of ₹3,26,066 over the Tribunal’s award, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization.
pp. 6–7Respondent No. 2, the insurer, was directed to deposit the enhanced amount with interest before the Tribunal within six weeks, and the claimant was entitled to release of the entire enhanced amount.
pp. 7–8Original Court PDF
SRI GANESH KARANIKAvsM/S GANPACT INDIA
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
