Facts
The applicants, M.S. Sabu and Viswambaran N.N., were Store Keepers Grade II in the Canteen Stores Department.
Source reference: no citationThey sought the benefit of the erstwhile pre-revised pay scales of Rs.4000-6000/-, Rs.5000-8000/- merged into a single Pay Band 2 with Grade Pay of Rs.4200/- and Rs.4600/- respectively, with retrospective effect from 01.01.2006.
Source reference: no citationSpecifically, they claimed benefits for the interregnum period between 01.01.2006 and 31.08.2008, when the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP) was made available.
Source reference: no citationThe Tribunal had previously ruled on 5th April 2018 that the applicants were eligible for pay fixation in Pay Band 2 plus Grade Pay of Rs.4600/- from 16.05.2007 and 18.05.2007, and that subsequent pay fixations should be modulated accordingly.
Source reference: no citationThe respondents challenged this order before the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala.
Source reference: no citationThe High Court, in OP(CAT) No.10 of 2019, set aside the Tribunal's 2018 order on 26.06.2025 and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
Source reference: p.3, para. 2The respondents argued that the applicants were in the ₹4000-6000 pay scale as of January 1, 2006, not the ₹5000-8000 scale.
Source reference: p.4, para. 4They contended that Annexure A-4(9) {Annexure A to CSD Order No.24/2012}, which clarified the grant of MACP benefits, specifically concerned the merger of ₹5000-8000 & ₹5500-9000 and ₹6500-10500 & ₹7450-11500 pay scales, and thus did not apply to the applicants.
Source reference: p.4, para. 4Conversely, the applicants argued that their second ACP placement on 16 May 2007 moved them to the revised ₹5000-8000 scale, entitling them to a grade pay of ₹4600 and ₹4800 as per the Department of Personnel and Training's clarification.
Source reference: p.4, para. 5Issues
Whether the applicants, initially in the ₹4000-6000 pay scale, are entitled to the benefits of financial upgradation (ACPS/MACP) in the grade pays of ₹4600 and ₹4800 in PB-2 for the period between 01.01.2006 and 31.08.2008, considering their placement into the ₹5000-8000 scale after 01.01.2006.
Source reference: p.4, para. 4-5Law Applied
The court primarily considered the clarification regarding the grant of benefits of MACPs to civilian employees as contained in Annexure A-4(9) {Annexure A to CSD Order No.24/2012}, specifically Sl. No. 26, which states that benefits of ACPS would be allowed for isolated cases due between 01.01.2006 and 31.08.2008 where pre-revised pay scales of Rs.5000-8000 & Rs.5500-9000 and Rs.6500-10500 & Rs.7450-11500 have been merged into single grade pay of Rs.4200 and Rs.4600 respectively w.e.f. 01.01.2006.
Source reference: p.3, para. 3This clarification directs that for these merged scales, the benefits of 1st and 2nd financial upgradations under ACPS should be considered in the grade pays of Rs.4600 and Rs.4800 in PB-2, as per para 5 of Annexure-I of MACPS dated 19.05.2009.
Source reference: p.3, para. 3The court also referred to the Kerala High Court's interpretation of this clarification in OP(CAT) No.10 of 2019.
Source reference: p.4, para. 6 and p.5, para. 8Reasoning
The Tribunal reviewed the Annexure A-4 clarification, noting that it explicitly addresses the merger of specific pre-revised pay scales (₹5000-8000, ₹5500-9000, ₹6500-10500, and ₹7450-11500) into a single Grade Pay of ₹4200 and ₹4600 (or ₹4600 and ₹4800 for second upgradation) effective 01.01.2006.
Source reference: p.3, para. 3; p.5, para. 8The Tribunal observed that the applicants were initially in the ₹4000-6000 pay scale, which was not part of the merged scales explicitly mentioned in the Annexure A-4 clarification.
Source reference: p.4, para. 4 & 5Although the applicants argued their second ACP placement on May 16, 2007, moved them to the revised ₹5000-8000 scale, the operative part of the clarification, as confirmed by the High Court, clearly limited the benefit to "isolated cases" where the pre-revised scales themselves had merged into the specified grade pays from 01.01.2006.
Source reference: p.3, para. 3; p.5, para. 8Since the applicants' initial pay scale (₹4000-6000) was not among those explicitly merged under the clarification, their subsequent placement through ACP did not qualify them for the benefits sought under this specific provision for the interregnum period.
Source reference: no citationHolding
The Tribunal concluded that the applicants are not entitled to the reliefs sought in the Original Application.
The OA was dismissed for lack of merit.
Source reference: p.5, ConclusionNo costs were awarded.
Source reference: p.5, ConclusionOriginal Court PDF
M.S. Sabu, Viswambaran N.N. v. Union of India, General Manager, Canteeen Stores Department, Area Manager, Canteen Stores Department, Original Application No. 180/1112/2014
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in