Chhattisgarh High Court

Advanced age and parity with co-accused justify grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS.

BLASIYUS TIGGA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: March 16, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The Applicant, a 64-year-old social worker, sought anticipatory bail regarding Crime No. 655/2024

Source reference: para. 1-3

The prosecution alleged that while verbal permission was granted for a small meeting of 10–15 people at Rajwar Bhawan, a large gathering of thousands occurred for the formation of the "Rashtriya Christian Morcha, Chhattisgarh"

Source reference: para. 2

It was further alleged that speakers delivered speeches containing objectionable remarks against the Hindu religion, thereby hurting religious sentiments

Source reference: para. 2

The Applicant was subsequently charged under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, and the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007

Source reference: para. 1
02

Issues

Whether the Applicant is entitled to the protection of anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, considering his age and the nature of the allegations

Source reference: para. 5
03

Law Applied

The Court applied Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which governs the grant of bail to persons apprehending arrest

Source reference: para. 1

Substantively, the case involved Sections 329(3), 333, 299, 115(2), 351(2), 319(2), 191(2), and 190 of the BNS, 2023, and Section 49 of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007

Source reference: para. 1

The Court also considered the principle of parity in bail and the relevance of the accused’s age and criminal antecedents in exercising judicial discretion

Source reference: para. 3-5
04

Reasoning

The Court weighed the prosecution's opposition, which highlighted one previous criminal antecedent, against the Applicant's personal circumstances.

Source reference: para. 4

The Court noted that the Applicant is 64 years old and that the trial is expected to be prolonged

Source reference: para. 3

Significantly, the Court applied the principle of parity, noting that a co-accused had already been granted bail by the trial court

Source reference: para. 3, 5

Without commenting on the ultimate merits of the allegations regarding the delivery of objectionable religious remarks, the Court determined that the facts and circumstances justified the exercise of discretion in favor of the Applicant

Source reference: para. 5
05

Holding

The High Court allowed the anticipatory bail application

It directed that in the event of arrest, the Applicant shall be released on bail upon executing a personal bond with one surety

Source reference: para. 6

The release is subject to specific conditions: the Applicant must not influence witnesses, must participate in the trial, must provide Aadhaar verification with a photograph, and must not commit similar future offences

Source reference: para. 6
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

BLASIYUS TIGGAvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · March 16, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment