Facts
The petitioners sought relief under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), alleging that the second respondent police were harassing them under the guise of an enquiry, following a representation dated 3 June 2026.
Source reference: pp. 2–3The Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that a petition enquiry was pending on the complaint of the third respondent.
Source reference: p. 3The Court considered the complaint of harassment and issued general safeguards for police enquiries.
Source reference: pp. 4–5Issues
Whether the Court should intervene under Section 528 BNSS to restrain the police from allegedly harassing the petitioners during a pending enquiry.
Source reference: pp. 3–4Whether safeguards should be prescribed for summoning persons and conducting police enquiries to prevent harassment.
Source reference: pp. 4–5Law Applied
Section 528 BNSS confers inherent powers on the High Court, but the Court ordinarily will not interfere with a police investigation legitimately conducted within Chapter XIII BNSS; nor does the Magistrate have power to interfere with the actual investigation or its mode.
Source reference: p. 4Section 179 BNSS provides for written summons to persons required to attend for an enquiry or investigation, and the Court directed that such summons specify a date and time.
Source reference: p. 5The Court also directed compliance with the Supreme Court’s guidelines on preliminary enquiries and FIR registration in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh, (2014) 2 SCC 1.
Source reference: p. 5Reasoning
The Court recognised that police have authority to conduct enquiries and investigations, but that this authority must be exercised legitimately and within the statutory framework.
Source reference: p. 4It also acknowledged that “harassment” may be understood differently by the persons summoned and the police officer, making procedural safeguards appropriate.
Source reference: p. 5Rather than determine the petitioners’ allegation or halt the pending enquiry, the Court prescribed safeguards: written summons under Section 179 BNSS, recording enquiry minutes in the relevant police diary, refraining from harassment, and adherence to Lalita Kumari.
Source reference: p. 5Holding
The Court disposed of the petition with observations and directions, without restraining the police from proceeding with the pending enquiry.
It directed police officers to summon persons in writing with a specified date and time, record enquiry minutes in the station diary or equivalent record, refrain from harassment, and comply with the Lalita Kumari guidelines.
Source reference: p. 5Acts & Sections Cited
2 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20232
Original Court PDF
VaradhanvsState rep.by
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
