Karnataka High CourtSocial Security and PensionsCivil Procedure and Evidence

After Marble Fell On Labourer’s Leg At Work, Karnataka HC Raises Interest On His Rs 5.89 Lakh Compensation To 12%

K. NARASIMULU S/O. K.KONDANNAv.THE CHIEF ENGINEER

After Marble Fell On Labourer’s Leg At Work, Karnataka HC Raises Interest On His Rs 5.89 Lakh Compensation To 12%. K. NARASIMULU S/O. K.KONDANNA vs THE CHIEF ENGINEER. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the rate of interest awarded on compensation should be modified

The court held

The appeal was allowed in part.

It also directed

The compensation award of ₹5,89,550 was affirmed, but interest was increased from 9% to 12% per annum from the date of the petition until realisation.

The Insurance Company was directed to deposit the compensation with accrued interest before the Tribunal within six weeks of receiving the certified copy of the judgment.

01Facts

On 27 May 2015, while unloading marble from a lorry during construction work, the appellant sustained an injury when a marble slab fell on his left leg.

pp. 3–4

He claimed compensation under the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923.

The Commissioner awarded him ₹5,89,550 with interest at 9% per annum.

p. 6

The appellant appealed seeking enhancement; the High Court modified the award by increasing the interest rate.

pp. 6, 10–11

02Issues

i.1. Whether the rate of interest awarded on compensation should be modified

p. 7

ii.2. Whether the monthly income adopted by the Commissioner should be modified

p. 7

iii.3. Whether the compensation awarded was inadequate and should be modified

p. 7

03Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 30(1) of the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923.

p. 2

The Court stated that the employer has a duty to pay interest on compensation, irrespective of any contract concerning interest, and considered 12% per annum appropriate in this case.

p. 8

The judgment cites no specific statutory provision governing the interest rate or any precedent.

Provisions in the judgment · 1

Employee Section 30

04Reasoning

The Court found that the wage register and master roll showed the appellant received ₹234 per day, and therefore upheld the income adopted by the Commissioner.

p. 9

It also found the compensation of ₹5,89,550 appropriate and left that amount unchanged.

p. 10

However, it considered the 9% interest awarded by the Commissioner insufficient and raised the rate to 12% per annum from the date of the claim petition until realisation.

p. 8, 10

05Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

pp. 10–11

The compensation award of ₹5,89,550 was affirmed, but interest was increased from 9% to 12% per annum from the date of the petition until realisation.

pp. 10–11

The Insurance Company was directed to deposit the compensation with accrued interest before the Tribunal within six weeks of receiving the certified copy of the judgment.

pp. 10–11
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

K. NARASIMULU S/O. K.KONDANNAvsTHE CHIEF ENGINEER

Karnataka High Court · October 27, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment