Chhattisgarh High CourtCriminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

After Resort-Party Clash, Chhattisgarh HC Denies Bail To Man Accused Of Reversing Car Over Partygoer Who Died

TUSHAR DHANDAv.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

After Resort-Party Clash, Chhattisgarh HC Denies Bail To Man Accused Of Reversing Car Over Partygoer Who Died. TUSHAR DHANDA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the applicant should be granted bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in light of the allegations, medical evidence, and eyewitness statements.

The court held

The Court answered the bail question in the negative.

It also directed

The Court rejected the applicant’s first bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

01Facts

The applicant was arrested in connection with Crime No. 390/2026, registered for an offence under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶ 2

The prosecution alleged that, after an altercation at a birthday party, the applicant reversed his car and ran it over Ujjwal Kumar, who later died from his injuries.

¶ 2

The applicant denied intending or knowing that his actions would cause death, relied on the absence of crush injuries and the inconclusive query report, and noted that the charge-sheet had been filed and he had no criminal antecedents.

¶ 3

The State opposed bail, relying on eyewitness accounts and the post-mortem findings, including head injuries and death from cerebral haemorrhage.

¶ 4–5

This was the applicant’s first bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

¶ 1

02Issues

i.Whether the applicant should be granted bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in light of the allegations, medical evidence, and eyewitness statements.

¶ 1, 7–9

ii.Whether the asserted absence of crush injuries and the inconclusive query report warranted bail at this stage.

¶ 8

03Law Applied

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, empowers the High Court to consider a bail application.

¶ 1

In deciding whether to grant bail, the Court considered the nature and gravity of the alleged offence, the injuries sustained and medical evidence, and the prima facie evidence attributing the act to the applicant.

¶ 1, 7–9

The alleged offence was punishable under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶ 1

Provisions in the judgment · 2 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 103

04Reasoning

The Court found that the post-mortem report recorded nine injuries, including a head injury, and attributed death to cerebral haemorrhage resulting from blunt-force head trauma.

¶ 7

It also considered the eyewitness statements to prima facie attribute to the applicant the act of reversing the vehicle at high speed and running it over the deceased.

¶ 7

The Court held that the absence of crush injuries and the query report could not, in isolation, displace the ocular evidence at the bail stage; the applicant’s account of the incident raised matters for trial.

¶ 8

Considering the specific allegations, medical evidence, and eyewitness accounts, the Court found no basis to grant bail.

¶ 9

05Holding

The Court answered the bail question in the negative.

¶ 10

The Court rejected the applicant’s first bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

¶ 10
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

TUSHAR DHANDAvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 30, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment