01Facts
The petitioner was allotted an MBBS seat at SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre in Round III of MCC NEET UG 2026–2027 counselling.
pp. 3–5On the final reporting date, she attended the college and paid ₹3,00,000, but an alleged delay in the NEFT transaction prevented the balance payment from being credited within the deadline; the college later refunded the amount.
pp. 3–5She made representations to MCC and sought permission to participate in the Special Stray Vacancy Round, despite her prior Round III allotment.
pp. 3–5On 4 November 2026, because registration was due to close that day, the Court directed MCC to permit her to register. At the final hearing, counsel reported that she had been enabled to participate.
pp. 5–602Issues
i.Whether the petitioner should be permitted to register for and participate in the Special Stray Vacancy Round despite her Round III allotment, where she had made a part payment but could not complete payment within the reporting deadline because of an alleged NEFT delay.
pp. 4–5ii.Whether, following the petitioner’s registration, the respondents should facilitate her participation in the stray-round counselling and the subsequent allotment process.
p. 603Law Applied
The petition invoked the High Court’s jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus.
p. 1The order cites no statute, regulation, or precedent as the basis for its decision.
The Court instead granted case-specific relief, directing MCC to allow registration in light of the petitioner’s part payment and the asserted transaction disruption.
p. 504Reasoning
The Court considered the petitioner’s payment of ₹3,00,000, her attendance at the college for certificate verification, and her subsequent representations as evidence of a genuine attempt to complete admission formalities.
pp. 4–5Given that registration for the Special Stray Vacancy Round was closing imminently, the Court treated the circumstances as a special case and directed MCC to permit registration.
pp. 4–5At the final hearing, the Court recorded that the petitioner had been enabled to participate and directed the respondents to facilitate her further participation and allotment process.
p. 605Holding
The Court disposed of the writ petition, directing the respondents to facilitate the petitioner’s proper participation in the stray-round counselling and the further allotment process.
p. 6It imposed no costs and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.
p. 6Original Court PDF
Premalatha C.R.BvsThe Medical Counseling Committee (MCC)
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
