Facts
The applicant, Vikrant Damodar Chaware, filed two Original Applications, OA No. 4620/2025 and OA No. 4862/2025, seeking relief primarily against Respondent No. 2, the Airport Authority of India (AAI)
Source reference: p.4, para. 2Issues
Whether the Airport Authority of India is amenable to the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal under Section 14(2) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
Source reference: p.4, para. 2Law Applied
The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) considered its jurisdiction under Section 14(2) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
Source reference: p.4, para. 2It referred to a prior decision by a Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in OA No. 351/00185/2024, which held that the Airport Authority of India is not amenable to its jurisdiction
Source reference: p.4, para. 2This view was affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Airport Authority of India and Others versus Rahul Vijay and Another in SLP (C) No. 30166/2025
Source reference: p.4, para. 2Reasoning
The Tribunal, following established precedent, determined that it lacked jurisdiction over the Airport Authority of India.
Source reference: no citationIt referenced a previous ruling by a Co-ordinate Bench in OA No. 351/00185/2024, which explicitly stated that the AAI does not fall under its purview as per Section 14(2) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
Source reference: p.4, para. 2This lack of jurisdiction was further bolstered by the fact that the Supreme Court had upheld this position in Airport Authority of India and Others versus Rahul Vijay and Another
Source reference: p.4, para. 2Consequently, because the primary relief sought by the applicant was against the AAI, the Tribunal found itself unable to proceed with the matter
Source reference: p.4, para. 2Holding
The Tribunal concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the Original Applications against the Airport Authority of India
Accordingly, both OA No. 4620/2025 and OA No. 4862/2025 were disposed of, with liberty granted to the applicant to approach the appropriate forum by filing suitable proceedings
Source reference: p.4, para. 3Pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any, were also disposed of
Source reference: p.4, para. 4There were no orders as to costs
Source reference: p.5, para. 5Original Court PDF
VIKRANT DAMODAR CHAWAREvsCIVIL AVIATION
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in