CAT - Delhi

Airport Authority of India not amenable to Tribunal's jurisdiction under Section 14(2) of Administrative Tribunals Act.

VIKRANT DAMODAR CHAWARE vs CIVIL AVIATION

CAT - DelhiJUDGMENT: February 19, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Vikrant Damodar Chaware, filed two Original Applications, OA No. 4620/2025 and OA No. 4862/2025, seeking relief primarily against Respondent No. 2, the Airport Authority of India (AAI)

Source reference: p.4, para. 2
02

Issues

Whether the Airport Authority of India is amenable to the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal under Section 14(2) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985

Source reference: p.4, para. 2
03

Law Applied

The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) considered its jurisdiction under Section 14(2) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985

Source reference: p.4, para. 2

It referred to a prior decision by a Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in OA No. 351/00185/2024, which held that the Airport Authority of India is not amenable to its jurisdiction

Source reference: p.4, para. 2

This view was affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Airport Authority of India and Others versus Rahul Vijay and Another in SLP (C) No. 30166/2025

Source reference: p.4, para. 2
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal, following established precedent, determined that it lacked jurisdiction over the Airport Authority of India.

Source reference: no citation

It referenced a previous ruling by a Co-ordinate Bench in OA No. 351/00185/2024, which explicitly stated that the AAI does not fall under its purview as per Section 14(2) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985

Source reference: p.4, para. 2

This lack of jurisdiction was further bolstered by the fact that the Supreme Court had upheld this position in Airport Authority of India and Others versus Rahul Vijay and Another

Source reference: p.4, para. 2

Consequently, because the primary relief sought by the applicant was against the AAI, the Tribunal found itself unable to proceed with the matter

Source reference: p.4, para. 2
05

Holding

The Tribunal concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the Original Applications against the Airport Authority of India

Accordingly, both OA No. 4620/2025 and OA No. 4862/2025 were disposed of, with liberty granted to the applicant to approach the appropriate forum by filing suitable proceedings

Source reference: p.4, para. 3

Pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any, were also disposed of

Source reference: p.4, para. 4

There were no orders as to costs

Source reference: p.5, para. 5
CAT - Delhi

Original Court PDF

VIKRANT DAMODAR CHAWAREvsCIVIL AVIATION

CAT - Delhi · February 19, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment