Facts
The Appellant/Insurance Company challenged the award dated 27.10.2018 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Balodabazar, in Claim Case No. 91/2017
Source reference: p. 2The Tribunal had awarded ₹8,54,800/- as compensation with interest to the legal heirs of the deceased, Kishram, following a motor accident involving a Hero Honda motorcycle
Source reference: p. 2The accident occurred on 16.12.2010
Source reference: p. 3The insurer appealed on the grounds that the compensation should be capped at ₹5,00,000/- pursuant to a later amendment and that the deceased driver lacked a valid driving license
Source reference: p. 3Issues
1. Whether the compensation awarded under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, should be restricted to ₹5,00,000/- as per the amendment to the Second Schedule which came into effect on 22.05.2018
Source reference: p. 32. Whether the Insurance Company proved that the deceased driver lacked a valid and effective driving license, thereby constituting a breach of policy terms
Source reference: p. 3Law Applied
Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which provides for compensation on a structured formula basis
Source reference: p. 2Second Schedule of the Act and the principle of prospective versus retrospective application of statutory amendments, specifically the amendment dated 22.05.2018
Source reference: p. 3, 4The evidentiary rule that the burden of proving a breach of insurance policy conditions (such as an invalid license) rests upon the insurer
Source reference: p. 3Reasoning
The Court observed that the accident occurred on 16.12.2010, significantly prior to the amendment of the Second Schedule of Section 163-A, which only took effect on 22.05.2018
Source reference: p. 3, 4The Court reasoned that the amended cap of ₹5,00,000/- could not be applied to an accident that occurred in 2010
Source reference: p. 4Regarding the driver's license, the Court upheld the Tribunal’s finding that the Insurance Company failed to produce evidence to prove that the license was forged or ineffective
Source reference: p. 3The Court found the Tribunal’s assessment of the deceased's yearly income at ₹40,320/- to be consistent with the schedule applicable at the time of the accident
Source reference: p. 3Holding
The High Court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Tribunal's award
It held that the compensation awarded was neither excessive nor subject to the 2018 amendment since the accident predated the amendment
Source reference: p. 4The Court further held that the insurer failed to establish a breach of policy conditions regarding the driving license
Source reference: p. 3No order as to costs was made
Source reference: p. 4Original Court PDF
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDvsSUKAWARA
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in