Facts
The applicants sought quashing of the charge-sheet dated 18 February 2022, summoning order dated 14 June 2022, and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 4331 of 2022 arising from Crime No. 200 of 2021, pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun, for offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Source reference: para. 6During the proceedings, the applicants, Respondent No. 2, and the injured person entered into an amicable settlement. A compounding application, supported by affidavits of the applicants, Respondent No. 2, and the injured person, was filed.
Source reference: para. 7–8Upon interaction with the Court, Respondent No. 2 and the injured person stated that they did not wish to prosecute the applicants further, while the applicants confirmed the settlement and sought permission to compound the offences.
Source reference: paras. 9–11The State raised no objection, observing that the offences were compoundable.
Source reference: para. 12Issues
Whether the offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC could be compounded in view of the settlement between the applicants, the complainant, and the injured person.
Source reference: paras. 7–13Whether, consequent upon such compounding, the charge-sheet, summoning order, and criminal proceedings should be quashed qua the applicants.
Source reference: paras. 13–14Law Applied
The Court applied the statutory law governing compounding of offences under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, holding that the offences alleged under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC were compoundable.
Source reference: para. 12It further applied the principle that where a dispute is personal in nature, the parties have amicably settled the matter, and the complainant and injured person do not wish to continue the prosecution, permitting the criminal trial to proceed would serve no useful purpose.
Source reference: para. 13Reasoning
The Court verified the settlement by personally interacting with the applicants, Respondent No. 2, and the injured person. All concerned parties confirmed that the dispute had been resolved and that the complainant and injured person no longer desired to prosecute the applicants.
Source reference: paras. 9–11Since the alleged offences were compoundable and the State had no objection, the Court concluded that the dispute was essentially private and that continuation of the criminal proceedings would be a futile exercise.
Source reference: paras. 12–13Accordingly, it permitted compounding and treated the criminal proceedings as liable to be terminated.
Source reference: no citationHolding
The compounding application was allowed.
Consequently, the charge-sheet dated 18 February 2022, summoning order dated 14 June 2022, and the entire proceedings in Criminal Case No. 4331 of 2022 arising from Crime No. 200 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC, were quashed qua the present applicants only.
Source reference: para. 14The criminal miscellaneous application and any pending application were disposed of accordingly.
Source reference: paras. 15–16Acts & Sections Cited
3 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Indian Penal Code, 18603
Original Court PDF
RAHUL PHARASIvsSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY HOME, DEHRADUN
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
