Facts
The petitioners were in possession of land situated at Dag No. 286, Village Nidanpur Part II, under Lakhipur Revenue Circle, Goalpara, Assam, pursuant to “Abantan Patra” issued in their favour on 04.04.2007.
Source reference: p. 3; p. 5They approached the Gauhati High Court seeking directions to the revenue authorities to issue settlement orders in respect of the land according to their possession and also apprehended eviction because settlement had not been granted.
Source reference: p. 2The Court found that the petitioners had not submitted applications for settlement, believing that the Abantan Patra itself constituted an allotment or settlement.
Source reference: p. 3During the hearing, the petitioners undertook to apply for settlement and requested protection from eviction pending consideration of their applications.
Source reference: p. 3–4Issues
Whether the Abantan Patra issued to the petitioners constituted a grant of settlement or merely permission to reside on the specified land?
Source reference: p. 3; p. 5Whether the petitioners were entitled to seek settlement/allotment of the land under the applicable law and policy?
Source reference: p. 3–4Whether the revenue authorities could evict the petitioners while their applications for settlement/allotment were pending?
Source reference: p. 4–5Law Applied
The Court applied the distinction between an Abantan Patra, which grants permission to occupy or reside on specified land subject to its terms and conditions, and a formal settlement, which requires an application, consideration under the applicable Settlement Rules and State policy, and payment of the prescribed premium.
Source reference: p. 3The Court further held that any application for settlement was to be considered within the framework of the Assam Land Policy, 2019 and in accordance with the prescribed practice and procedure.
Source reference: p. 3–4No specific statutory provision or judicial precedent was cited in the order.
Source reference: no citationReasoning
The Court examined the Abantan Patra and held that it authorised the petitioners to reside on the land but did not confer a settled proprietary or occupancy right equivalent to formal settlement.
Source reference: p. 3; p. 5Since the petitioners had not applied for settlement, the Court declined to direct the authorities to issue settlement orders outright.
Source reference: p. 3Instead, it accepted the petitioners’ submission that they would file appropriate applications and directed that those applications be considered under the Assam Land Policy, 2019.
Source reference: p. 3–4Recognising that the petitioners had entered possession pursuant to official permission, the Court granted limited interim protection: if applications were filed within 90 days, eviction proceedings were not to be initiated during their consideration.
Source reference: p. 5The protection was not made permanent and would cease upon rejection of the applications, after which eviction could be undertaken only in accordance with due process of law.
Source reference: p. 5Holding
The writ petition was disposed of.
The Court held that the Abantan Patra dated 04.04.2007 did not amount to settlement of the land; it merely permitted the petitioners to reside on the specified plots.
Source reference: p. 5The petitioners were granted liberty to submit appropriate applications for settlement in accordance with law and the Assam Land Policy, 2019.
Source reference: p. 5The authorities were directed not to take steps for eviction if the petitioners filed applications for allotment of the lands under their possession within 90 days from the judgment, and to maintain that protection while the applications were under consideration.
Source reference: p. 5If the applications were rejected, eviction could follow only through due procedure of law.
Source reference: p. 5Original Court PDF
Samiran Nessa And AnrvsThe State Of Assam And Ors
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
