Facts
The applicant sought anticipatory bail regarding Crime No. 19/2026 registered at Women Police Station, Raigarh
Source reference: p. 1-2The prosecution alleged that the applicant entered a relationship with the victim in December 2024 through social media and repeatedly engaged in physical relations under a false promise of marriage
Source reference: para. 2It was further alleged that the applicant later assaulted and confined the victim in Bilaspur
Source reference: para. 2The applicant contended that the prosecutrix is a major and educated woman, the relationship was entirely consensual, and the FIR was lodged with unexplained delay following the breakdown of the relationship
Source reference: para. 3The trial court had previously rejected the applicant’s anticipatory bail plea
Source reference: para. 2Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the protection of anticipatory bail under the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, given the nature of the allegations and the consensual history of the parties
Source reference: para. 1, 5Law Applied
Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which governs the grant of anticipatory bail
Source reference: para. 1Sections 69 (sexual intercourse by deceitful means), 115(2) (voluntarily causing hurt), and 127(2) (wrongful confinement) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)
Source reference: para. 1Statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS
Source reference: para. 5Reasoning
The court evaluated the materials on record, specifically the victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS, noting that the victim is an adult
Source reference: para. 5The court observed that the parties had been in contact since 2024 and had established a relationship that appeared to be consensual
Source reference: para. 5The Court reasoned that the criminal complaint was triggered only after the relationship "could not materialize"
Source reference: para. 5Due to the consensual nature of the long-term relationship and the absence of clear evidence of initial deception or likelihood of the applicant absconding, the Court found the applicant's custodial interrogation unnecessary
Source reference: para. 3, 5Holding
The High Court allowed the application and granted anticipatory bail to the applicant
The court held that if arrested, the applicant shall be released upon executing a personal bond and providing one local surety subject to conditions such as non-interference with witnesses, regular appearance before the trial court, submission of Aadhaar credentials, and prohibition against committing similar offences
Source reference: para. 6Original Court PDF
PRIYANK JOSHIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in