Facts
The applicant sought anticipatory bail regarding Crime No. 31/2026 registered at P.S. Sakti for alleged offenses under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
Source reference: para 1The victim filed a written report alleging that the applicant engaged in sexual intercourse with her on the pretext of marriage at various locations between May 2025 and November.
Source reference: para 2The applicant contended that the victim was a married woman with children who voluntarily left her husband to live with him, and the relationship was consensual.
Source reference: para 3After the relationship failed to materialize into marriage, the FIR was lodged alleging sexual exploitation.
Source reference: para 3Issues
Whether the applicant is entitled to the benefit of anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, considering the consensual nature of the relationship and the marital status of the victim.
Source reference: paras 1, 5Law Applied
Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which governs the grant of anticipatory bail.
Source reference: para 1Section 64(2)(m) (pertaining to rape/sexual assault) and Section 351(2) (pertaining to criminal intimidation) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
Source reference: para 1Evidentiary value of the victim's statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS.
Source reference: para 5Reasoning
The Court examined the materials on record, specifically the victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS and noted that the victim was a married woman with children who had voluntarily vacated her matrimonial home to reside with the applicant.
Source reference: para 5The Court observed that the physical relationship appeared to be consensual in nature rather than coerced and reasoned that the criminal complaint was initiated only after the relationship failed to materialize into marriage.
Source reference: para 5Given the consensual nature of the history and the fact that the applicant is a permanent resident with no likelihood of absconding, the Court found the case fit for anticipatory bail.
Source reference: paras 3, 5Holding
The High Court allowed the MCRCA and granted anticipatory bail to the applicant.
The Court held that in the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released upon executing a personal bond and one surety, subject to conditions including: non-interference with witnesses, regular appearance before the trial court, submission of Aadhaar credentials for verification, and abstaining from similar offenses in the future.
Source reference: para 6Original Court PDF
AMARNATH SAHUvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in