Chhattisgarh High Court

Anticipatory Bail Granted to Offence-Accused Woman Based on Parity and Permanent Resident Status

SMT. URVASHI SHRIVAS vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 20, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Smt. Urvashi Shrivas, sought anticipatory bail following the registration of Crime No. 99/2026 at Police Station Takhatpur for alleged fraud

Source reference: para. 3-4

The prosecution alleged that the applicant, in connivance with others, obtained government financial assistance of Rs. 4,00,000/- under a Social Security Scheme by filing a claim supported by forged documents

Source reference: para. 4

Specifically, while she claimed her husband, Purshottam Shrivas, died of a snake bite, an inquiry conducted by the Tahsildar and police suggested discrepancies in death records (Merg Intimation) and raised suspicions regarding the actual cause of death

Source reference: para. 4

The applicant sought parity with a co-accused who had already been granted bail

Source reference: para. 5
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, despite allegations of financial fraud against the State

Source reference: para. 3, 6, 8
03

Law Applied

Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 (corresponding to Section 438 CrPC), regarding the grant of bail to persons apprehending arrest

Source reference: para. 3

Section 420 (Cheating), 467 (Forgery of valuable security), 468 (Forgery for purpose of cheating), 471 (Using as genuine a forged document), and 34 (Common intention)

Source reference: para. 3-4

principle of parity in bail matters

Source reference: para. 5, 8
04

Reasoning

Despite the State’s opposition on the grounds that the applicant had successfully defrauded the government of compensation, the Court noted that a co-accused, Mahendra Kumar Manhar, had already been granted anticipatory bail in MCRCA No. 378/2026 on 11.03.2026

Source reference: para. 5, 6, 8

The Court observed that the incident of the husband's death was admitted (though the cause was disputed) and took into account the applicant's status as a local resident and a woman, concluding she was unlikely to abscond or tamper with evidence

Source reference: para. 5

Consequently, the Court found the applicant eligible for parity and protection from custodial interrogation

Source reference: para. 8
05

Holding

The High Court allowed the application (MCRCA) and granted anticipatory bail to the applicant

The Court directed that in the event of arrest, she be released upon executing a personal bond and one surety, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses, regular appearance before the trial court, and a prohibition against committing similar offences in the future

Source reference: para. 9

Any violation of these conditions would entitle the State to move for cancellation of bail

Source reference: para. 9-10
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

SMT. URVASHI SHRIVASvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 20, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment