Facts
On January 6, 2026, police conducted a raid in Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur, based on a tip regarding online cricket gambling.
Source reference: para. 2They arrested Ayush Agrawal, whose interrogation and seized mobile phone data allegedly implicated the applicant, Prakash Panjwani, as an associate in the gambling syndicate
Source reference: para. 2WhatsApp chats were recovered from co-accused Ayush and another individual, Shanky Saluja
Source reference: para. 2The applicant, apprehending arrest for offenses under Section 7(2) of the Chhattisgarh Gambling (Prohibition) Act, 2022, and Section 112 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, moved the High Court for anticipatory bail after being named in the memorandum statement of the co-accused
Source reference: para. 1-2Issues
Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail when the primary evidence against him is a memorandum statement of a co-accused, unsupported by corroborating digital evidence
Source reference: para. 3, 7Law Applied
Section 7(2) of The Chhattisgarh Gambling (Prohibition) Act, 2022, and Section 112 of the BNS, 2023
Source reference: para. 1the absence of incriminating material beyond a co-accused's statement and the lack of criminal antecedents are significant factors for granting relief
Source reference: para. 7Reasoning
The Court observed that the prosecution's case against the applicant relied almost exclusively on the memorandum statement of co-accused Ayush Agrawal
Source reference: para. 7Upon reviewing the Cyber Cell report dated March 12, 2026, the Court found that the applicant's name did not appear in any WhatsApp chats retrieved from the arrested co-accused; instead, the chats referred to a "Rohit Panjwani"
Source reference: para. 5, 7The Court further noted that the applicant had no prior criminal record and that the other co-accused, Ayush Agrawal and Shanky Saluja, had already been released on regular bail by the Sessions Court
Source reference: para. 7Since no direct incriminating material or digital trail connected the applicant to the online gambling syndicate at this stage, the Court determined that custodial interrogation was not warranted
Source reference: para. 7Holding
The Court allowed the application and granted anticipatory bail to the applicant
It held that in the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of the like sum
Source reference: para. 8The relief was made subject to conditions, including that the applicant must cooperate with the interrogation as required, refrain from influencing witnesses, and appear before the trial court on all scheduled dates
Source reference: para. 8Original Court PDF
PRAKASH PANJWANIvsTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in