Facts
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, apprehending arrest in Crime No. 277/2026, registered at Police Station Purani Bhilai for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and the Chhattisgarh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990.
Source reference: para. 1The prosecution alleged that vehicles were carrying iron scrap from the Bhilai Steel Plant without authority.
Source reference: para. 2The applicant submitted that he was an employee of co-accused Himanshu Khandelwal and operated a JCB on his instructions; the State did not dispute that employment and role.
Source reference: para. 3The parties also informed the Court that several co-accused had been granted anticipatory or regular bail.
Source reference: paras. 3–4Issues
Whether the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail in connection with the alleged offences
Source reference: paras. 1, 5–6Whether the applicant’s asserted role as a JCB operator, absence of criminal antecedents, and the bail granted to co-accused supported granting anticipatory bail
Source reference: paras. 3–6Law Applied
Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, provides the statutory basis for an application seeking anticipatory bail.
Source reference: para. 1The Court considered the facts and circumstances, the nature of the allegations, the parties’ submissions, and the fact that other co-accused had been granted bail when deciding whether to grant relief.
Source reference: para. 6No precedent or further legal test was cited in the order.
Source reference: no citationReasoning
The Court considered the applicant’s claimed subordinate role as an employee and JCB operator, which the State did not dispute, alongside the submission that he had no criminal antecedents.
Source reference: paras. 3–4It also took account of the bail granted to several co-accused. On those circumstances, and without expressing any opinion on the merits, the Court found it appropriate to allow the application.
Source reference: para. 6Holding
The Court allowed the anticipatory-bail application.
It directed that, in the event of arrest in connection with the crime in question, the applicant be released on a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety in the like amount, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation, non-interference with witnesses or the trial, and appearance before the trial court on each date fixed.
Source reference: paras. 7–8Note: Paragraph 1 identifies Crime No. 277/2026, while paragraph 7 refers to crime “(130/2026)”.
Source reference: paras. 1, 7Acts & Sections Cited
12 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231
Original Court PDF
SANJU YADAVvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
