Facts
The applicants sought anticipatory bail in Crime No. 606/2026, registered at Police Station Janjgir for alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 238, 296, 3(5), 309, 324(5), 326(f) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
Source reference: para. 1–2The complainant alleged that the applicants took and burned crops on ancestral land, threatened and assaulted him, and snatched his mobile phone
Source reference: para. 1–2The applicants relied on a property dispute and stated that Applicant No. 2 had reported the incident to police on 19 May 2026, while the complainant lodged his report on 14 August 2026.
Source reference: para. 3–6The State opposed bail, relying on a witness’s account of the incident, including an allegation that some applicants pointed a pistol-like object at the complainant
Source reference: para. 3–6Issues
1. Whether the applicants should be granted anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 606/2026, having regard to the allegations and the circumstances relied on by the parties
Source reference: para. 7–82. If anticipatory bail is granted, what conditions should govern the applicants’ release
Source reference: para. 9Law Applied
Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 provides for a direction for grant of bail to a person apprehending arrest.
Source reference: para. 1, 8The Court considered the nature of the allegations and the circumstances of the case in deciding whether to grant that relief
Source reference: para. 1, 8The order cites no precedent or further legal test
Source reference: no citationReasoning
The Court considered the competing accounts, the property dispute between the complainant and Applicant No. 2, and the timing of the reports.
Source reference: para. 4, 8It noted that Applicant No. 2 had lodged a report on the day of the incident, whereas the complainant’s report was made approximately three months later.
Source reference: para. 4, 8On those circumstances, and without expressing any view on the merits, the Court found it appropriate to grant anticipatory bail despite the State’s reliance on the witness’s account
Source reference: para. 4, 8Holding
The Court allowed the application and directed that, in the event of arrest, each applicant be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety for the like amount, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer
The applicants must cooperate with interrogation, refrain from influencing persons acquainted with the facts or prejudicing a fair trial, and appear before the trial court on each date fixed until disposal of the trial
Source reference: para. 9The Registry was directed to send a certified copy of the order to the trial court.
Source reference: para. 10Acts & Sections Cited
9 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20238
Original Court PDF
VINAY MADHUKARvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
