CAT - ['Allahabad']
Social Security and PensionsAdministrative and Public Law

Railway pensioners qualify for additional pension only upon completing 80 years of age.

OM PRAKASH MISHRA vs NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY

CAT - ['Allahabad']JUDGMENT: October 13, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Railway pensioners qualify for additional pension only upon completing 80 years of age.. OM PRAKASH MISHRA vs NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY. CAT - ['Allahabad']. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, a retired railway servant born on 1 July 1945, challenged the date from which he was granted 20% additional pension.

Source reference: paras. 2–3, 5

The respondents revised his PPO to grant the enhancement from 1 July 2025, when he completed 80 years of age. The applicant sought payment from 1 July 2024, the first day of his 80th year, together with interest.

Source reference: paras. 2–3, 5

He relied on decisions interpreting similar pension provisions, while the respondents contended that the applicable rules required completion of age 80.

Source reference: paras. 6–9

The Tribunal considered the rival submissions and the applicable pension rules.

Source reference: paras. 10–19
02

Issues

1. Whether a railway pensioner is entitled to 20% additional pension from the first day of the 80th year, upon completing 79 years of age, or only after completing 80 years.

Source reference: paras. 11, 13, 19

2. Whether the decisions relied on by the applicant required the Tribunal to grant the enhancement from 1 July 2024, notwithstanding the applicable Railway Pension Rules.

Source reference: paras. 17–18
03

Law Applied

Rule 44(6) of the Railway Services Pension Rules, 2026 provides for additional pension after completion of 80 years of age, at 20% for pensioners aged 80 to less than 85; clause (b) provides that payment is from the first day of the calendar month in which the entitlement falls due, with an illustration based on the pensioner completing 80 years.

Source reference: para. 13

The Tribunal also noted the analogous provision in Rule 44 of the CCS Pension Rules, 2021 and the clarifications in the Department of Pension and Pensioners’ Welfare Office Memorandum dated 3 October 2008, which specify payment from the first day of the month in which the pensioner completes the relevant age.

Source reference: paras. 15–16

The Tribunal distinguished Virendra Dutt Gyani v. Union of India and other decisions cited by the applicant as arising under different provisions or predating the later pension rules.

Source reference: paras. 17–18
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal read Rule 44(6) as requiring the pensioner first to complete 80 years; the provision fixing payment from the first day of the relevant calendar month governs when payment begins after that age-based eligibility arises.

Source reference: paras. 13, 16, 19

Since the applicant was born on 1 July 1945, he completed 80 years on 1 July 2025 and became entitled to the 20% enhancement from that date, not from 1 July 2024, when he entered his 80th year.

Source reference: para. 19

The cited decisions did not alter that result because, in the Tribunal’s view, they concerned different statutory provisions or the position before the relevant rules were promulgated.

Source reference: paras. 17–18
05

Holding

The Tribunal held that the applicant was entitled to 20% additional pension from 1 July 2025, upon completing 80 years of age, and not from the first day of his 80th year.

It dismissed the Original Application as devoid of merit and made no order as to costs.

Source reference: para. 19

All associated miscellaneous applications were disposed of.

Source reference: para. 20
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Linked provisions open on LawLens.

High Court Judges (Salaries And Conditions Of Service) Act, 19541

Section 17B
CAT - ['Allahabad']

Original Court PDF

OM PRAKASH MISHRAvsNORTH EASTERN RAILWAY

CAT - ['Allahabad'] · October 13, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment