Chhattisgarh High Court
Civil Procedure and EvidenceArbitration and Mediation

Appeals may be disposed of in terms of an amicable settlement between the parties.

M/s Shrishrimal Plantation Ltd. vs M/S ARIHANT VARDHMAN BIOTECH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: September 01, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Appeals may be disposed of in terms of an amicable settlement between the parties.. M/s Shrishrimal Plantation Ltd. vs M/S ARIHANT VARDHMAN BIOTECH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The connected writ appeals arose between M/s Shrishrimal Plantation Ltd., M/s Arihant Vardhman Biotech, State Bank of India, and other parties concerning disputes not otherwise elaborated upon in the judgment.

Source reference: no citation

In W.A. No. 170 of 2025, the appellant, M/s Arihant Vardhman Biotech, stated that it had amicably resolved its dispute with respondent No. 2, M/s Shrishrimal Plantation Ltd., and sought withdrawal of the appeal through I.A. No. 4 of 2026.

Source reference: para. 3

In W.A. Nos. 59 and 72 of 2025, the appellant stated that its dispute with respondent No. 1 had also been amicably settled pursuant to a settlement deed dated 05.08.2026 and sought appropriate directions through I.A. No. 3 of 2026.

Source reference: para. 5

The appellant in W.A. Nos. 59 and 72 of 2025 was unrepresented when the matters were heard, although its counsel had filed the applications.

Source reference: para. 1, para. 5
02

Issues

Whether W.A. No. 170 of 2025 should be permitted to be withdrawn in view of the parties’ amicable settlement?

Source reference: para. 3–4

Whether W.A. Nos. 59 and 72 of 2025 should be disposed of in terms of the settlement deed dated 05.08.2026?

Source reference: para. 5–7
03

Law Applied

The Court applied the general procedural principle that a litigant may withdraw an appeal where the dispute has been amicably resolved, subject to the Court permitting such withdrawal.

Source reference: para. 3–4

It further applied the principle that, upon being satisfied regarding a settlement between the parties, the Court may allow an interlocutory application seeking appropriate directions and dispose of the pending proceedings in terms of the settlement.

Source reference: para. 5–7
04

Reasoning

In W.A. No. 170 of 2025, the appellant expressly stated that the dispute with respondent No. 2 had been amicably resolved and that it no longer wished to prosecute the appeal. On that basis, the Court allowed I.A. No. 4 of 2026 and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

Source reference: para. 3–4

In W.A. Nos. 59 and 72 of 2025, the Court took note of the settlement deed dated 05.08.2026 between the concerned parties and the prayer made in I.A. No. 3 of 2026. Finding the applications deserving of acceptance in view of the settlement, the Court allowed them and directed that the appeals be disposed of in accordance with the settlement deed.

Source reference: para. 5–7
05

Holding

I.A. No. 4 of 2026 was allowed, and W.A. No. 170 of 2025 was dismissed as withdrawn.

I.A. No. 3 of 2026 in W.A. Nos. 59 and 72 of 2025 was allowed, and both appeals were disposed of in terms of the settlement deed dated 05.08.2026.

Source reference: para. 6–7

The settlement deed was directed to form part of the record.

Source reference: para. 8
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

M/s Shrishrimal Plantation Ltd.vsM/S ARIHANT VARDHMAN BIOTECH

Chhattisgarh High Court · September 01, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment