Chhattisgarh High Court

Appellate court enhances motor accident compensation where awarded sum for injuries is found grossly inadequate.

SURENDRA KUMAR SONI vs MAHESH KUMAR

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: May 06, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The appellant/claimant, Surendra Kumar Soni, sustained injuries in a motor vehicle accident involving a vehicle (CG-22/7342) driven by Respondent No. 1 and owned by Respondent No. 2

Source reference: p. 1-2

The appellant filed a claim petition (Claim Case No. H-145/2014) on 15.12.2014

Source reference: p. 3

The 3rd Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Balodabazar, passed an award on 23.10.2019, granting a total compensation of Rs. 1,04,633/-

Source reference: para. 1

Dissatisfied with the quantum, the appellant preferred this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement on the grounds that the award was grossly inadequate relative to the injuries sustained

Source reference: para. 1-2
02

Issues

1. Whether the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal was just and reasonable or required enhancement based on the nature of injuries and circumstances of the case

Source reference: para. 2, 5
03

Law Applied

The court primarily applied Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, regarding appeals against awards passed by Claims Tribunals

Source reference: para. 1

It adhered to the principle of "just compensation," which necessitates that the indemnity granted should adequately reflect medical expenses, physical and mental agony, transportation, and special diet (nutritional food) necessitated by accidental injuries

Source reference: para. 5
04

Reasoning

The Court reviewed the Tribunal's itemized award, which consisted of Rs. 92,633/- for medical expenses, Rs. 5,000/- for physical and mental agony, Rs. 5,000/- for transportation, and Rs. 2,000/- for nutritional food

Source reference: para. 5

Upon circumspection of the records and the nature of the injuries, the Court determined that the existing award was on the "lower side" and failed to provide equitable relief

Source reference: para. 5

The Court concluded that an additional lump sum was necessary to meet the ends of justice, while maintaining the validity of the interest from the date of the original claim application to ensure the claimant was compensated for the delay in adjudication

Source reference: para. 5
05

Holding

The Court allowed the appeal in part, holding that the original compensation was inadequate

The Court awarded an additional sum of Rs. 75,000/- over and above the Rs. 1,04,633/- granted by the Tribunal

Source reference: para. 5

Respondent No. 3 (The New India Insurance Company Ltd.) was directed to deposit the enhanced amount within 30 days, carrying interest at 7% per annum from the date of the claim application (15.12.2014) until realization

Source reference: para. 5
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

SURENDRA KUMAR SONIvsMAHESH KUMAR

Chhattisgarh High Court · May 06, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment