Facts
The appellant/claimant, Surendra Kumar Soni, sustained injuries in a motor vehicle accident involving a vehicle (CG-22/7342) driven by Respondent No. 1 and owned by Respondent No. 2
Source reference: p. 1-2The appellant filed a claim petition (Claim Case No. H-145/2014) on 15.12.2014
Source reference: p. 3The 3rd Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Balodabazar, passed an award on 23.10.2019, granting a total compensation of Rs. 1,04,633/-
Source reference: para. 1Dissatisfied with the quantum, the appellant preferred this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement on the grounds that the award was grossly inadequate relative to the injuries sustained
Source reference: para. 1-2Issues
1. Whether the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal was just and reasonable or required enhancement based on the nature of injuries and circumstances of the case
Source reference: para. 2, 5Law Applied
The court primarily applied Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, regarding appeals against awards passed by Claims Tribunals
Source reference: para. 1It adhered to the principle of "just compensation," which necessitates that the indemnity granted should adequately reflect medical expenses, physical and mental agony, transportation, and special diet (nutritional food) necessitated by accidental injuries
Source reference: para. 5Reasoning
The Court reviewed the Tribunal's itemized award, which consisted of Rs. 92,633/- for medical expenses, Rs. 5,000/- for physical and mental agony, Rs. 5,000/- for transportation, and Rs. 2,000/- for nutritional food
Source reference: para. 5Upon circumspection of the records and the nature of the injuries, the Court determined that the existing award was on the "lower side" and failed to provide equitable relief
Source reference: para. 5The Court concluded that an additional lump sum was necessary to meet the ends of justice, while maintaining the validity of the interest from the date of the original claim application to ensure the claimant was compensated for the delay in adjudication
Source reference: para. 5Holding
The Court allowed the appeal in part, holding that the original compensation was inadequate
The Court awarded an additional sum of Rs. 75,000/- over and above the Rs. 1,04,633/- granted by the Tribunal
Source reference: para. 5Respondent No. 3 (The New India Insurance Company Ltd.) was directed to deposit the enhanced amount within 30 days, carrying interest at 7% per annum from the date of the claim application (15.12.2014) until realization
Source reference: para. 5Original Court PDF
SURENDRA KUMAR SONIvsMAHESH KUMAR
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in