Facts
The six applicants, Nursing Officers associated with the NORCET-2020 batch at AIIMS, Deoghar, challenged the respondents’ action concerning their inter se seniority.
Source reference: no citationDuring the proceedings, the respondents filed their written statement, which was taken on record.
Source reference: para. 2The applicants’ counsel acknowledged receipt of the written statement and relied on paragraph 9 thereof, stating that AIIMS, Deoghar had issued a provisional seniority order dated 28 January 2026 and thereafter a final seniority list through Office Order No. AIIMS Deo/Seniority File/No./2025-26/58 dated 17 March 2026, after considering the objections received.
Source reference: para. 3The final list included the applicants’ names based on their NORCET-2020 rank.
Source reference: para. 3Both parties submitted that the applicants’ grievance had consequently been considered and accepted, leaving nothing further for adjudication.
Source reference: para. 4Issues
Whether the applicants’ grievance regarding preparation of the seniority list of Nursing Officers belonging to the NORCET-2020 batch had been redressed by the respondents’ issuance of the final seniority list
Source reference: para. 3Whether the Original Application had become infructuous and should therefore be disposed of without further adjudication
Source reference: paras. 4–5Law Applied
The Tribunal applied the procedural principle that where the relief or grievance forming the subject matter of an Original Application has been subsequently addressed or granted by the respondents, no live controversy remains for adjudication and the application may be disposed of as infructuous.
Source reference: paras. 3–5The Tribunal also acted on the statements made by counsel for both parties regarding complete or substantial redressal of the grievance.
Source reference: paras. 3–5No specific statutory provision or judicial precedent was cited or applied in the order.
Source reference: no citationReasoning
The respondents’ written statement recorded that the provisional and final seniority lists had been issued after considering objections and that the applicants had been included in the final list according to their NORCET-2020 rank.
Source reference: para. 3The Tribunal treated this administrative action as substantially addressing the grievance raised in the Original Application.
Source reference: no citationSince counsel for both sides agreed that the applicants’ grievance had been considered and acceded to, the Tribunal found that no surviving dispute required adjudication.
Source reference: para. 4Applying the principle that proceedings lacking a live cause for determination may be terminated as infructuous, the Tribunal disposed of the application accordingly.
Source reference: para. 5Holding
The Tribunal held that the applicants’ grievance had been substantially redressed through the final seniority list issued by AIIMS, Deoghar.
Accordingly, O.A. No. 051/00048/2026 was disposed of as having become infructuous, with no order as to costs.
Source reference: para. 5–6Original Court PDF
sHAKTI KUMARvsHEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
![Application disposed as infructuous after respondents issued a final seniority list addressing applicants’ grievance.. sHAKTI KUMAR vs HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE. CAT - ['Patna']. LawLens](/stories/thumbnails/application-disposed-as-infructuous-after-respondents-issued-a-final-seniority-list-addres-c9141930187b4079bed8c828896b58ce.webp)