CAT - ['Patna']
Employment and Labour LawAdministrative and Public Law

Application disposed as infructuous after respondents issued a final seniority list addressing applicants’ grievance.

sHAKTI KUMAR vs HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

CAT - ['Patna']JUDGMENT: September 14, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Application disposed as infructuous after respondents issued a final seniority list addressing applicants’ grievance.. sHAKTI KUMAR  vs HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE. CAT - ['Patna']. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The six applicants, Nursing Officers associated with the NORCET-2020 batch at AIIMS, Deoghar, challenged the respondents’ action concerning their inter se seniority.

Source reference: no citation

During the proceedings, the respondents filed their written statement, which was taken on record.

Source reference: para. 2

The applicants’ counsel acknowledged receipt of the written statement and relied on paragraph 9 thereof, stating that AIIMS, Deoghar had issued a provisional seniority order dated 28 January 2026 and thereafter a final seniority list through Office Order No. AIIMS Deo/Seniority File/No./2025-26/58 dated 17 March 2026, after considering the objections received.

Source reference: para. 3

The final list included the applicants’ names based on their NORCET-2020 rank.

Source reference: para. 3

Both parties submitted that the applicants’ grievance had consequently been considered and accepted, leaving nothing further for adjudication.

Source reference: para. 4
02

Issues

Whether the applicants’ grievance regarding preparation of the seniority list of Nursing Officers belonging to the NORCET-2020 batch had been redressed by the respondents’ issuance of the final seniority list

Source reference: para. 3

Whether the Original Application had become infructuous and should therefore be disposed of without further adjudication

Source reference: paras. 4–5
03

Law Applied

The Tribunal applied the procedural principle that where the relief or grievance forming the subject matter of an Original Application has been subsequently addressed or granted by the respondents, no live controversy remains for adjudication and the application may be disposed of as infructuous.

Source reference: paras. 3–5

The Tribunal also acted on the statements made by counsel for both parties regarding complete or substantial redressal of the grievance.

Source reference: paras. 3–5

No specific statutory provision or judicial precedent was cited or applied in the order.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The respondents’ written statement recorded that the provisional and final seniority lists had been issued after considering objections and that the applicants had been included in the final list according to their NORCET-2020 rank.

Source reference: para. 3

The Tribunal treated this administrative action as substantially addressing the grievance raised in the Original Application.

Source reference: no citation

Since counsel for both sides agreed that the applicants’ grievance had been considered and acceded to, the Tribunal found that no surviving dispute required adjudication.

Source reference: para. 4

Applying the principle that proceedings lacking a live cause for determination may be terminated as infructuous, the Tribunal disposed of the application accordingly.

Source reference: para. 5
05

Holding

The Tribunal held that the applicants’ grievance had been substantially redressed through the final seniority list issued by AIIMS, Deoghar.

Accordingly, O.A. No. 051/00048/2026 was disposed of as having become infructuous, with no order as to costs.

Source reference: para. 5–6
CAT - ['Patna']

Original Court PDF

sHAKTI KUMARvsHEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

CAT - ['Patna'] · September 14, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment