Facts
The fifteen petitioners are agriculturists and landowners in Village Nagaridih, District Janjgir-Champa.
Source reference: p. 1-3They alleged that their lands were submerged due to the construction of the Basantpur Barrage over the Mahanadi River.
Source reference: para. 3Despite submitting representations to the Collector on October 16, 2025, and December 19, 2025, requesting compensation, no land acquisition proceedings were initiated by the respondent authorities.
Source reference: para. 3The petitioners approached the High Court seeking a direction for time-bound disposal of their claims, citing parity with previous judicial orders in similar matters.
Source reference: para. 2, 3Issues
1. Whether the petitioners are entitled to a time-bound direction for the respondent authorities to verify claims, initiate land acquisition proceedings, and determine compensation for lands submerged by the Basantpur Barrage project.
Source reference: para. 3, 6Law Applied
Article 226 of the Constitution of India regarding the High Court's power to issue directions to state authorities.
Source reference: para. 2The principle of parity and judicial consistency, specifically following the precedent set by a coordinate Bench of the Chhattisgarh High Court in Surendra Kumar and Others vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others (WPC No. 2468 of 2023), decided on June 14, 2023.
Source reference: para. 3, 5Where private land is utilized for public projects (specifically the Basantpur Barrage), the State is under an obligation to verify claims and initiate formal acquisition proceedings to determine compensation within a stipulated timeframe.
Source reference: para. 5Reasoning
The court noted that the petitioners’ grievance and the underlying facts were identical to the issues resolved in Surendra Kumar and Others vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others.
Source reference: para. 3, 6Counsel for the State did not dispute the prayer for the matter to be decided in line with the earlier precedent.
Source reference: para. 4If the petitioners' lands were indeed utilized as a submergence area for the Barrage, the State is legally bound to formalize the acquisition and compensate the owners.
Source reference: para. 5, 6Holding
The High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the petitioners to submit a fresh representation to the respondent authorities within 30 days.
The respondent authorities are directed to verify the petitioners' claims, initiate land acquisition proceedings if necessary, and determine the compensation due if the land was utilized for the Basantpur Barrage submergence area within 90 days from the date of filing the representation.
Source reference: para. 5, 6All pending interlocutory applications were dismissed.
Source reference: para. 8Original Court PDF
RAMKUMARvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in