CAT - Delhi

Authority directed to decide representation for Old Pension Scheme benefits via reasoned and speaking order.

Tapan Shit vs M/O DEFENCE

CAT - DelhiJUDGMENT: March 19, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, an employee at the Ordnance Factory, Raipur, filed an Original Application (OA) under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985

Source reference: p. 2

The applicant sought a declaration that he is entitled to the benefits of the Old Pension Scheme (OPS) because his appointment was made pursuant to an advertisement issued prior to the enforcement of the New Pension Scheme (NPS)

Source reference: p. 2

While the OA was pending and awaiting a reply from the respondents, the applicant’s counsel requested that the Tribunal direct the respondents to decide the applicant's pending representations dated 08.08.2023 and 06.02.2025 by way of a reasoned and speaking order

Source reference: p. 2-3
02

Issues

Whether the respondents should be directed to consider and decide the applicant's pending representations regarding the transition to the Old Pension Scheme within a specified timeframe?

Source reference: p. 3
03

Law Applied

Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985

Source reference: p. 2

Principles of Natural Justice, which require administrative authorities to address grievances through reasoned and speaking orders to ensure fairness and transparency in decision-making

Source reference: p. 3
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal avoided a merit-based adjudication of the applicant's claim to the Old Pension Scheme at this stage.

Source reference: p. 3

The court noted the consensus between the parties: the applicant’s counsel sought a direction for disposal of representations, and the respondents’ counsel agreed to consider said representations in accordance with the law.

Source reference: p. 3

The Tribunal reasoned that the interests of justice would be best served by requiring the competent authority to pass a "reasoned and speaking order," thereby ensuring the applicant's claims are evaluated legally before any further judicial intervention.

Source reference: p. 3
05

Holding

The Tribunal disposed of the O.A. at the admission stage without expressing an opinion on the merits of the applicant's claim.

The court directed the competent authority among the respondents to decide the pending representations dated 08.08.2023 and 06.02.2025 by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with the law within eight weeks from the receipt of the certified copy of the order.

Source reference: p. 3

No order was made as to costs.

Source reference: p. 4
CAT - Delhi

Original Court PDF

Tapan ShitvsM/O DEFENCE

CAT - Delhi · March 19, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment