Chhattisgarh High Court
Criminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Bail courts cannot assess specific allegations against the accused’s defence version.

DURGESHWAR PRASAD CHOURE @ MOCHI GABBAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 05, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Bail courts cannot assess specific allegations against the accused’s defence version.. DURGESHWAR PRASAD CHOURE @ MOCHI GABBAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant was arrested in connection with Crime No. 83/2026, registered at Police Station Arjuni, District Dhamtari, for an offence under Section 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Source reference: para. 1–4

The prosecution alleged that, while visiting the victim’s home for a ritual, the applicant attempted to outrage her modesty and fled when she raised an alarm.

Source reference: para. 1–4

The applicant denied the allegation, asserting that his contact with the victim was inadvertent and that the victim’s husband assaulted him; he relied on his medico-legal certificate.

Source reference: para. 1–4

The charge-sheet had been filed, the applicant had no criminal antecedents, and none of the ten cited witnesses had been examined.

Source reference: para. 1–4

He sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Source reference: para. 1–4
02

Issues

Whether the applicant should be granted regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in light of the allegations and the circumstances advanced in support of bail.

Source reference: para. 1, 3–8

Whether the applicant’s defence that the contact was inadvertent and the prosecution case was false could be assessed at the bail stage.

Source reference: para. 6–7
03

Law Applied

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, provides the basis for the application for regular bail.

Source reference: para. 1

The alleged offence was under Section 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Source reference: para. 1

The Court stated that, at the bail stage, its role is confined to assessing whether a prima facie case exists; the veracity of specific allegations in the FIR is not to be determined by weighing the defence version at that stage.

Source reference: para. 7
04

Reasoning

The FIR and the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS contained specific allegations that the applicant had deliberately attempted to outrage her modesty and made inappropriate comments.

Source reference: para. 4, 6

In the Court’s view, those allegations disclosed a prima facie case.

Source reference: para. 6–7

It declined to determine whether the contact was inadvertent or whether the complaint was false, observing that the applicant’s defence could not be used at the bail stage to test the veracity of the allegations.

Source reference: para. 6–7

Having regard to the allegations and the nature and gravity of the offence, the Court was not inclined to grant bail, notwithstanding the submissions concerning custody, the filed charge-sheet, the applicant’s lack of antecedents, and the

05

Acts & Sections Cited

3 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20232

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20231

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

DURGESHWAR PRASAD CHOURE @ MOCHI GABBARvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment