Chhattisgarh High Court

BAIL GRANTED: APPLICANT RELEASED DUE TO DELAY, FILED CHARGE SHEET, AND PROLONGED TRIAL.

SHIVRAAJ YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: March 13, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The complainant, Prakash Yadav, reported that on the night of November 10, 2025, an unknown person stole Rs. 6000/-, two mobile phones, and a Mangalsutra worth Rs. 51,675/- from his house through an open window

Source reference: para. 2

An FIR was registered on November 30, 2025, for offenses under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of the BNS against an unknown person, following an 18-day delay from the incident date

Source reference: para. 2, 3

During the investigation, stolen mobile phones, cash (Rs. 2,500/-), and a gold mangalsutra were seized from the applicant, Shivraaj Yadav.

Source reference: para. 2

The applicant was arrested after confessing in his memorandum statement that he, along with a child in conflict with law named Kunal Dhruv, committed the theft

Source reference: para. 2

The applicant has been in judicial custody since November 30, 2025, and a charge sheet has been filed

Source reference: para. 3, 6

The applicant has three criminal antecedents, with two cases pending and one acquittal

Source reference: para. 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant, Shivraaj Yadav, should be granted regular bail in connection with Crime No. 1645/2025

Source reference: para. 1
03

Law Applied

The court primarily applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, regarding the power to grant bail

Source reference: para. 1

It also considered the offenses punishable under Sections 331(3), 305(A), and 3(5) of the BNS, under which the applicant was charged

Source reference: para. 1, 7

The principles guiding bail applications, such as the period of detention and the likelihood of trial conclusion taking time, were applied

Source reference: para. 6

Conditions for bail were imposed, including not seeking adjournments (implicit), ensuring presence in court under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita

Source reference: para. 7(ii)

provisions for misuse of liberty of bail including proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS and proceedings under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita

Source reference: para. 7(iii), 7(iv)
04

Reasoning

The court considered the applicant's argument that he was falsely implicated and that there was an 18-day delay in lodging the FIR, which was not explained

Source reference: para. 3

It was noted that a charge sheet had been filed and the applicant had been in custody since November 30, 2025

Source reference: para. 3, 6

The court acknowledged the prosecution's submission regarding the applicant's three criminal antecedents, with two cases pending

Source reference: para. 4

Despite the antecedents, the court found that given the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of allegations, the period of detention, and the likelihood of the trial taking a considerable amount of time to conclude, the applicant was entitled to be released on bail

Source reference: para. 6
05

Holding

The court allowed the bail application

The applicant, Shivraaj Yadav, involved in Crime No. 1645/2025 under Sections 331(3), 305(A) & 3(5) of the BNS, is to be released on regular bail upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned court

Source reference: para. 7

The bail is subject to several conditions, including filing an undertaking not to seek adjournments, remaining present in court on fixed dates, and complying with provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and BNSS regarding presence and conduct during trial

Source reference: para. 7(i), 7(ii), 7(iii), 7(iv)
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

SHIVRAAJ YADAVvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · March 13, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment