Chhattisgarh High Court
Criminal LawCriminal Procedure and Evidence

Bail granted considering parity with co-accused, continued custody, and likely trial delay.

MUNNA GIRI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 05, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Bail granted considering parity with co-accused, continued custody, and likely trial delay.. MUNNA GIRI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The prosecution alleged that, late on 4 April 2026, the prosecutrix was forcibly taken into a shop and sexually assaulted by the applicant and other accused persons.

Source reference: para. 2

The applicant was arrested on 5 April 2026 and charged under Sections 70(1) and 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS).

Source reference: paras. 1, 3

Seeking regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), he relied on the prosecutrix’s evidence at trial, the filing of the charge-sheet, the likely duration of the trial, his lack of criminal antecedents, and the grant of bail to three co-accused.

Source reference: para. 3

The State opposed bail, citing the applicant’s alleged direct involvement, but confirmed that he had no criminal antecedents and that the co-accused had been granted bail.

Source reference: paras. 4–5
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant should be released on regular bail under Section 483 BNSS, having regard to the circumstances of the case and the bail granted to co-accused.

Source reference: paras. 3–7
03

Law Applied

Section 483 BNSS provides the basis for the application for regular bail.

Source reference: paras. 1, 8

In deciding the application, the Court considered the applicant’s period in custody, completion of the investigation and filing of the charge-sheet, the anticipated time for trial, the position of the co-accused, and the applicant’s lack of criminal antecedents.

Source reference: paras. 3–7

The alleged offences were under Sections 70(1) and 115(2) BNS.

Source reference: para. 1

The Court imposed conditions requiring attendance and non-interference with the trial, including references to Section 269 BNS, Section 84 BNSS, and Section 209 BNS.

Source reference: para. 8
04

Reasoning

The Court found that the applicant had been in custody since 5 April 2026, the charge-sheet had been filed, and the trial might take considerable time to conclude.

Source reference: para. 7

It also took account of the fact that three co-accused had been granted bail and that the applicant had no criminal antecedents.

Source reference: paras. 4–5, 7

On those considerations, and without expressing any view on the merits of the case, the Court concluded that bail was warranted.

Source reference: para. 7
05

Holding

The Court allowed the application and directed the applicant’s release on a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety for the like amount, subject to the stated conditions concerning adjournments, attendance, and personal appearance at specified stages of the trial.

A certified copy was directed to be sent to the trial court for information and compliance.

Source reference: para. 9
06

Acts & Sections Cited

7 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20233

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20234

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

MUNNA GIRIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment