Madhya Pradesh High Court

Bail granted for aged applicant with no criminal antecedents based on prosecution witness testimony.

Kishorlal Utwal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High CourtJUDGMENT: March 16, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

This is the third bail application filed by Kishorelal Utwal ("applicant") under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023.

Source reference: p.1

The applicant is in judicial custody since September 22, 2025, in connection with Crime No. 437/2025 registered at Police Station-Taal, District-Ratlam (M.P.), for offenses punishable under Sections 80(2), 3(4) of the BNSS, 2023, and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Source reference: p.1

His first bail application was dismissed as withdrawn on October 30, 2025 (M.Cr.C. No. 47062/2025), and his second application was also dismissed as withdrawn on November 25, 2025 (M.Cr.C. No. 54238/2025).

Source reference: p.1

Subsequent to the dismissal of the second application, Brother Akaash (PW-1), Sisters Varsha Pandey (PW-2), and Kanak Sisodia (PW-3) have been examined before the trial Court.

Source reference: p.1

The alleged offense involves the suicide of Meera, the applicant's daughter-in-law, on September 20, 2025, due to alleged harassment over dowry by her husband Gaurav, father-in-law Kishore Utwal (applicant), mother-in-law Rekha Utwal, and sister-in-law Khushi.

Source reference: p.2-3

The applicant was arrested on September 22, 2025.

Source reference: p.3
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant, Kishorelal Utwal, should be granted regular bail given the stage of the trial and the examination of material prosecution witnesses?

Source reference: p.1-3
03

Law Applied

The court primarily applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, which governs the grant of regular bail.

Source reference: p.1

The principles considered for bail include the gravity of the alleged offense, criminal antecedents of the applicant, flight risk, socio-economic status, likelihood of tampering with evidence, influencing witnesses, and the duration of trial.

Source reference: p.2-3
04

Reasoning

The court considered the applicant's arguments that he is falsely implicated, and general, omnibus allegations were leveled against him.

Source reference: p.2

It was noted that the material prosecution witnesses (PW-1, PW-2, and PW-3) have been examined and did not support the accusation.

Source reference: p.2

The applicant has a clean record, family roots, and no history of evading the law.

Source reference: p.2

The court also considered the applicant's age (around 65 years) and profession as a laborer, as well as the fact that he has been in custody since September 22, 2025.

Source reference: p.2-3

The court found that the contentions advanced by the applicant had prima-facie merit and could not be dismissed as baseless.

Source reference: p.3

The court also noted that there was no likelihood of the applicant fleeing from justice, tampering with evidence, or influencing remaining witnesses, especially since key witnesses had already been examined and no criminal antecedents were reported against him.

Source reference: p.3

The trial is expected to take time to conclude, and continued incarceration would cause hardship.

Source reference: p.2-3
05

Holding

The court found no compelling reason to continue the applicant's incarceration.

Therefore, the application for bail was allowed.

Source reference: p.4

The applicant-Kishorelal Utwal shall be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with one solvent surety of the same amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, subject to specific conditions.

Source reference: p.4-5
Madhya Pradesh High Court

Original Court PDF

Kishorlal UtwalvsThe State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · March 16, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment