Madhya Pradesh High Court

Bail granted for excise offense involving 63 bulk liters of liquor where no criminal antecedents exist.

Shahid Qadri v. The State of Madhya Pradesh [M.R.C.C. No. 10751 of 2026]

Madhya Pradesh High Court2 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Shahid Qadri, was intercepted by ASI Savitri Katara while traveling on an Activa vehicle.

Source reference: p. 2

Upon search, 63 bulk litres of illicit country-made plain liquor were seized from his possession, leading to his arrest on January 8, 2026, for transporting liquor without a valid permit.

Source reference: p. 2

FIR No. 08/2026 was registered at Police Station Panwasa, District Ujjain.

Source reference: no citation

The applicant, a 51-year-old labourer with no prior criminal record, filed this first bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, after the completion of the investigation and submission of the final report.

Source reference: p. 1-2
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, considering the quantity of liquor seized and his lack of criminal antecedents.

Source reference: p. 2-3
03

Law Applied

The court primarily applied Section 34(2) of the M.P. Excise Act, 1915, which penalizes the unlawful transport of intoxicants.

Source reference: p. 1-2

Procedurally, the application was governed by Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.

Source reference: p. 1

The court also referred to the procedural mandate of Section 309 of the Cr.P.C. (now Section 346 of the BNSS, 2023) regarding the expeditious conduct of trial proceedings.

Source reference: p. 3
04

Reasoning

The court evaluated the merits of the bail plea by balancing the gravity of the offence against the applicant’s personal circumstances.

Source reference: no citation

It noted that the investigation was complete and the final report had been filed, reducing the risk of evidence tampering.

Source reference: p. 2

The court emphasized the applicant’s socio-economic status as a labourer, his age (51 years), and his clean criminal record as factors mitigating the likelihood of recidivism or fleeing from justice.

Source reference: p. 2

Furthermore, the court observed that since the offence is triable by a Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) and the trial is expected to take time, continued incarceration without a compelling reason was unjustified.

Source reference: p. 2-3
05

Holding

The Court allowed the application and directed the release of the applicant on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety of the same amount.

The holding is subject to conditions including regular court attendance, refraining from similar offences, and prohibiting any inducement or threat to witnesses.

Source reference: p. 3

The court clarified that these observations are limited to the bail stage and do not reflect on the eventual merits of the trial.

Source reference: p. 3
Madhya Pradesh High Court

Original Court PDF

Shahid Qadri v. The State of Madhya Pradesh [M.R.C.C. No. 10751 of 2026]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment