Facts
The applicant was arrested on 08.01.2026 after police intercepted a vehicle (TVSXL Super No. CG 10 NA 8747) near the Birnipali barrier following a tip-off regarding the illegal transport of Ganja from Odisha
Source reference: para 2A search of the vehicle yielded seven packets of Ganja weighing 06 KG 580 Grams
Source reference: para 2The applicant was charged under Section 20(B) of the NDPS Act and has been in custody since the date of the incident
Source reference: para 3The applicant sought regular bail, contending that the quantity seized was "intermediate" and that the investigation (charge-sheet) was complete
Source reference: para 3Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, given the quantity of contraband seized and the status of the trial
Source reference: para 1, 6Law Applied
Section 20(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, which penalizes the production, manufacture, possession, or transport of cannabis.
Source reference: para 3Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which imposes stringent conditions for bail in cases involving "commercial quantities" (defined as more than 20 kgs for Ganja)
Source reference: para 3Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, governing the High Court's power to grant bail
Source reference: para 1Reasoning
The Court observed that the total quantity of Ganja seized (06 KG 580 Grams) falls below the threshold of 20 KG required to qualify as a "commercial quantity"
Source reference: para 3, 6Consequently, the rigorous "twin conditions" for bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act—which require the court to be satisfied that the accused is not guilty and unlikely to commit further offenses—were not attracted
Source reference: para 3The Court further noted that the charge-sheet had already been filed, the applicant had no prior criminal antecedents, and he had been incarcerated for over three months (since 08.01.2026)
Source reference: para 3, 6Given that the trial was expected to take considerable time, the Court found no justification for continued pretrial detention
Source reference: para 6Holding
The Court answered the issue in the affirmative and allowed the bail application
The applicant was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, subject to specific conditions [including] strict compliance with Sections 209, 269, and 351 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Section 84 of the BNSS to prevent the abuse of liberty
Source reference: para 7Original Court PDF
MANJALA MALIYA @ MANJ LALvsTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in