Facts
The applicant, a 50-year-old gym owner, filed a first bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.
Source reference: para. 1He was arrested on March 8, 2026, in connection with Crime No. 700/2025 registered at PS Panagar, Jabalpur.
Source reference: para. 1The complainant, a 23-year-old employee at the applicant's gym, alleged that on June 8, 2025, the applicant raped her at Laxmi Resort and threatened her life.
Source reference: para. 7The applicant contended it was a consensual relationship discovered by his wife, leading to a dispute.
Source reference: para. 4Investigation is complete and the charge-sheet has been filed.
Source reference: para. 4Issues
Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, considering the allegations of rape and criminal intimidation while the trial is pending.
Source reference: para. 7-9Law Applied
The court primarily applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, regarding the grant of regular bail.
Source reference: para. 1It assessed the application based on the gravity of the offence under Sections 64(1) (rape) and 351(2) (criminal intimidation) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023.
Source reference: para. 1, 5, 7The court also applied established principles for bail, including the lack of criminal antecedents, the status of the investigation (completion of charge-sheet), the likelihood of the accused fleeing from justice, and the socio-economic roots of the applicant.
Source reference: para. 4, 8Reasoning
The court balanced the State's objection regarding the gravity of the offence and the period the applicant was absconding against the applicant's clean record and family responsibilities.
Source reference: para. 5, 8It noted that since the charge-sheet has been filed, custodial interrogation is no longer required and the trial will take time to conclude.
Source reference: para. 7The court observed that the complainant’s counsel expressed "no objection" to the bail.
Source reference: para. 6Given the applicant's age, socio-economic status, and lack of recidivism, the court determined there was no compelling reason for continued incarceration or apprehension of tampering with evidence, provided stringent conditions were imposed due to his previous period of abscondance.
Source reference: para. 8, 9Holding
The Court allowed the application and directed the release of the applicant on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with one solvent surety.
The grant of bail is subject to conditions including: regular appearance before the trial court, no commission of similar offences, no tampering with evidence or witnesses, and a specific "stringent condition" requiring the applicant to mark his presence at PS Panagar on the first Saturday of every month until the trial concludes.
Source reference: para. 10Original Court PDF
Uday Singh RaghuwanshivsThe State Of Madhya Pradesh
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in