Chhattisgarh High Court

Bail granted to accused with no criminal antecedents where investigation is complete and charge-sheet filed.

NARENDRA MAHAWAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 23, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Narendra Mahawar, was arrested on 11.02.2026 in connection with Crime No. 09/2026 registered at Mahila Thana, Raigarh

Source reference: para. 1, 3

The complainant alleged that on 09.02.2026, while she and her sister were in their car, five individuals (including the applicant) in a Grand Vitara intercepted them twice, made obscene gestures, passed remarks, and one co-accused (Pradeep Patel) allegedly disrobed himself

Source reference: para. 2

The applicant filed this first bail application on the grounds of false implication, lack of criminal antecedents, and the fact that the primary allegations of disrobing were directed at a co-accused

Source reference: para. 3

The State opposed bail, citing the gravity of the act and the previous rejection of anticipatory bail for other co-accused persons

Source reference: para. 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) considering the nature of the allegations and his period of detention

Source reference: para. 1, 6
03

Law Applied

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) regarding the grant of regular bail

Source reference: para. 1

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), specifically Sections 78(2) (Stalking), 126(2) (Wrongful restraint), 79 (Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman), 75(3) (Sexual harassment), and 3(5) (Joint liability)

Source reference: para. 1

Section 183 of the BNSS regarding the recording of the victim's statement

Source reference: para. 6
04

Reasoning

The court evaluated the facts and circumstances, noting the gravity of the offense involving the interception of the victim's vehicle and the commission of obscene acts

Source reference: para. 6

However, the court balanced these allegations against several mitigating factors: the applicant had been in detention since 11.02.2026, the charge-sheet had already been filed, and the applicant possessed no prior criminal record

Source reference: para. 3, 6

Although the court acknowledged that the anticipatory bail of three co-accused had been previously rejected, it distinguished the present application as one for regular bail following the completion of the investigation (filing of the charge-sheet) and the recording of the victim’s statement

Source reference: para. 6

Consequently, the court determined that further custodial detention was not necessary during the trial

Source reference: para. 6, 9
05

Holding

The court allowed the application and directed that the applicant be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties

The bail is subject to specific conditions, including an undertaking not to seek unnecessary adjournments and mandatory presence during key trial stages [para. 8]. The court further directed the trial court to endeavor to conclude the trial within six months

Source reference: para. 9
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

NARENDRA MAHAWARvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 23, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment