Facts
The applicant, Kanti, filed her first bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023
Source reference: para. 1The prosecution alleged that the applicant, being the second wife of co-accused Kamaluddin, conspired to withdraw CMPF and gratuity funds amounting to ₹4,51,000/- belonging to Kamaluddin
Source reference: para. 2It is alleged that the applicant's photo was edited onto the PAN and Aadhaar cards of the first wife (complainant Nasima Begam) to facilitate this withdrawal, despite a Family Court order dated 31-07-2025 restraining the release of said funds
Source reference: para. 2The applicant was arrested on 28.01.2026
Source reference: para. 3Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail considering her gender, age, lack of criminal antecedents, and length of incarceration
Source reference: para. 6Law Applied
The court applied the provisions of Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the grant of regular bail
Source reference: para. 1The substantive charges were registered under Sections 319(1) (Cheating), 318(4) (Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), 338 (Forgery of valuable security), 336(1) (Forgery), 340(2) (Using as genuine a forged document), read with Section 3(5) (Joint liability) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023
Source reference: para. 1Reasoning
The Court weighed the gravity of the allegations against the personal circumstances of the applicant. It noted that the applicant is a 50-year-old woman and has been in custody since January 28, 2026
Source reference: para. 6The Court observed that the charge-sheet had not yet been filed and that the trial was likely to take a significant amount of time to conclude
Source reference: para. 3, 6Critically, the Court highlighted that the applicant had no prior criminal antecedents
Source reference: para. 6Balancing the nature of the allegations involving the fraudulent withdrawal of funds via document forgery with the principles of liberty and the absence of a criminal history, the Court determined that continued incarceration was not warranted
Source reference: para. 6Holding
The Court allowed the application and granted bail to the applicant
The holding directed the release of the applicant on a personal bond with two sureties, subject to specific conditions: (i) an undertaking not to seek unnecessary adjournments; (ii) mandatory presence during trial or proceedings under Section 269 BNS for absence; (iii) initiating proceedings under Section 209 BNS and Section 84 BNSS if bail is misused; and (iv) mandatory personal appearance for framing of charges and recording of statements under Section 351 BNSS
Source reference: para. 7Original Court PDF
KANTIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in