Chhattisgarh High Court

Bail granted to female accused without criminal antecedents in forgery case involving fraudulent pension withdrawal.

KANTI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 20, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Kanti, filed her first bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023

Source reference: para. 1

The prosecution alleged that the applicant, being the second wife of co-accused Kamaluddin, conspired to withdraw CMPF and gratuity funds amounting to ₹4,51,000/- belonging to Kamaluddin

Source reference: para. 2

It is alleged that the applicant's photo was edited onto the PAN and Aadhaar cards of the first wife (complainant Nasima Begam) to facilitate this withdrawal, despite a Family Court order dated 31-07-2025 restraining the release of said funds

Source reference: para. 2

The applicant was arrested on 28.01.2026

Source reference: para. 3
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail considering her gender, age, lack of criminal antecedents, and length of incarceration

Source reference: para. 6
03

Law Applied

The court applied the provisions of Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the grant of regular bail

Source reference: para. 1

The substantive charges were registered under Sections 319(1) (Cheating), 318(4) (Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), 338 (Forgery of valuable security), 336(1) (Forgery), 340(2) (Using as genuine a forged document), read with Section 3(5) (Joint liability) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023

Source reference: para. 1
04

Reasoning

The Court weighed the gravity of the allegations against the personal circumstances of the applicant. It noted that the applicant is a 50-year-old woman and has been in custody since January 28, 2026

Source reference: para. 6

The Court observed that the charge-sheet had not yet been filed and that the trial was likely to take a significant amount of time to conclude

Source reference: para. 3, 6

Critically, the Court highlighted that the applicant had no prior criminal antecedents

Source reference: para. 6

Balancing the nature of the allegations involving the fraudulent withdrawal of funds via document forgery with the principles of liberty and the absence of a criminal history, the Court determined that continued incarceration was not warranted

Source reference: para. 6
05

Holding

The Court allowed the application and granted bail to the applicant

The holding directed the release of the applicant on a personal bond with two sureties, subject to specific conditions: (i) an undertaking not to seek unnecessary adjournments; (ii) mandatory presence during trial or proceedings under Section 269 BNS for absence; (iii) initiating proceedings under Section 209 BNS and Section 84 BNSS if bail is misused; and (iv) mandatory personal appearance for framing of charges and recording of statements under Section 351 BNSS

Source reference: para. 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

KANTIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 20, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment