Facts
On November 23, 2025, police officials conducted a road blockade near D.K. College. Upon signaling a vehicle (bearing registration no. CG/22/AC/7587) to stop, the occupant abandoned the vehicle and fled the scene
Source reference: para 2A subsequent search of the vehicle resulted in the recovery of 31.860 bulk liters of illicit liquor
Source reference: para 2The applicant was arrested on December 22, 2025, in connection with Crime No. 1138/2025 at Police Station Balodabazar for offenses under the Excise Act
Source reference: para 1, 6This is the applicant's first bail application before the High Court
Source reference: para 1Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the alleged offense under Section 34(2) of the Excise Act
Source reference: para 1, 6Law Applied
Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which provides the High Court with the power to grant regular bail
Source reference: para 1The substantive offense was considered under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, which pertains to the illegal possession or transportation of liquor
Source reference: para 1The Court invoked procedural safeguards under Sections 84, 209, 269, and 351 of the BNSS to impose conditional liberty and ensure the applicant's presence during trial
Source reference: para 7Reasoning
The Court evaluated the application by balancing the gravity of the offense against the period of incarceration and the progress of the investigation.
Source reference: para 6The Court noted that the applicant had been in custody since December 22, 2025
Source reference: para 6Crucially, the State Counsel informed the Court that the charge-sheet had already been filed, indicating that custodial interrogation was no longer required
Source reference: para 4, 6The Court took into account the applicant's clean criminal record, noting he has no previous antecedents
Source reference: para 6Given that the trial's conclusion would likely take significant time and there was no evidence suggested by the State that the applicant would tamper with evidence or abscond, the Court found it fit to exercise its discretion in favor of granting bail
Source reference: para 6Holding
The High Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant upon furnishing a personal bond with two local sureties
The holding clarified that the applicant must strictly adhere to several conditions: he must not seek adjournments when witnesses are present, must appear on every trial date, and must be present for the framing of charges and recording of statements under Section 351 of the BNSS
Source reference: para 7Any violation of these conditions allows the trial court to treat the default as an abuse of the liberty of bail and proceed in accordance with law
Source reference: para 7Original Court PDF
VEDPRAKASH YADAV @ KHILESHvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in