Chhattisgarh High Court

Bail granted under Excise Act considering clean criminal antecedents and completion of investigation.

VEDPRAKASH YADAV @ KHILESH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: March 23, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

On November 23, 2025, police officials conducted a road blockade near D.K. College. Upon signaling a vehicle (bearing registration no. CG/22/AC/7587) to stop, the occupant abandoned the vehicle and fled the scene

Source reference: para 2

A subsequent search of the vehicle resulted in the recovery of 31.860 bulk liters of illicit liquor

Source reference: para 2

The applicant was arrested on December 22, 2025, in connection with Crime No. 1138/2025 at Police Station Balodabazar for offenses under the Excise Act

Source reference: para 1, 6

This is the applicant's first bail application before the High Court

Source reference: para 1
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the alleged offense under Section 34(2) of the Excise Act

Source reference: para 1, 6
03

Law Applied

Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which provides the High Court with the power to grant regular bail

Source reference: para 1

The substantive offense was considered under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, which pertains to the illegal possession or transportation of liquor

Source reference: para 1

The Court invoked procedural safeguards under Sections 84, 209, 269, and 351 of the BNSS to impose conditional liberty and ensure the applicant's presence during trial

Source reference: para 7
04

Reasoning

The Court evaluated the application by balancing the gravity of the offense against the period of incarceration and the progress of the investigation.

Source reference: para 6

The Court noted that the applicant had been in custody since December 22, 2025

Source reference: para 6

Crucially, the State Counsel informed the Court that the charge-sheet had already been filed, indicating that custodial interrogation was no longer required

Source reference: para 4, 6

The Court took into account the applicant's clean criminal record, noting he has no previous antecedents

Source reference: para 6

Given that the trial's conclusion would likely take significant time and there was no evidence suggested by the State that the applicant would tamper with evidence or abscond, the Court found it fit to exercise its discretion in favor of granting bail

Source reference: para 6
05

Holding

The High Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant upon furnishing a personal bond with two local sureties

The holding clarified that the applicant must strictly adhere to several conditions: he must not seek adjournments when witnesses are present, must appear on every trial date, and must be present for the framing of charges and recording of statements under Section 351 of the BNSS

Source reference: para 7

Any violation of these conditions allows the trial court to treat the default as an abuse of the liberty of bail and proceed in accordance with law

Source reference: para 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

VEDPRAKASH YADAV @ KHILESHvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · March 23, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment